Posted on 02/15/2022 12:30:21 PM PST by Coronal
Rat judge. Rat jury. Rat “justice”.
Injustice.
So...open season on “defaming” those on the left? Let’s go Brandon.
AP = America’s Pravda.
Civil case=preponderance of evidence, not “beyond a reasonable doubt....
That isn’t what this is about. It’s about showing malicious intent.
Palin SHOULD have sued her running mate, THAT’S who “ruined her rep”...
Palin should appeal based upon jury tampering by the Judge. The Judge could have not announced his intentions publicly and ruled after the jury returned its verdict. He announced it in advance knowing that the jury was not sequestered and would learn of his intentions.
No kidding...
And since when does someone get a free pass for damaging
someone’s public image, by simply saying, oops, we didn’t
mean to.
That may be the test, but then this sort of thing is
impossible to prove. Who is going to admit a dire objective?
I still believe one of the most vicious anti conservative hate crimes in America was the December 12, 2008 burning of Sarah Palins church with women and children inside and temperatures below zero.
Hatred of Palin at that time initiated the unique era of our time that violence against conservatives is rhetorically viable.
NYT plays a big role in such attitudes.
Great movie. Paul Newman was brilliant.
The point being it (MI) would have to be proven by a preponderance of evidence.
When the guy ferventled apologized that would’ve given me, as a juror, that evidence.
But anyway, messon learned, don’t sue folks in their territory, either the jury is already single- minded or the judge will not allow, or spoil the case....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.