Posted on 02/16/2021 4:54:51 PM PST by E. Pluribus Unum
FR: Never Accept the Premise of Your Opponent’s Argument
From a related thread...
Patriots are reminded that the states have never amended the Constitution to give the federal government the specific power to regulate INTRAstate labor.
To begin with, pre-FDR era, state sovereignty-respecting Supreme Court justices had emphasized the already clear meaning of the Commerce Clause, that this clause does not give Congress any power to regulate intrastate commerce.
"Article I, Section 8, Clause 3: To regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes;"
"State inspection laws, health laws, and laws for regulating the internal commerce of a State, and those which respect turnpike roads, ferries, &c. are not within the power granted to Congress [emphases added].” —Gibbons v. Ogden, 1824.
”From the accepted doctrine that the United States is a government of delegated powers, it follows that those not expressly granted, or reasonably to be implied from such as are conferred, are reserved to the states, or to the people. To forestall any suggestion to the contrary, the Tenth Amendment was adopted. The same proposition, otherwise stated, is that powers not granted are prohibited [emphasis added].” —United States v. Butler, 1936.
Justice Joseph Story later used “the wages of labor” as an example of a power that Congress does not have.
"Agriculture, colonies, capital, machinery, the wages of labour [emphasis added], the profits of stock, the rents of land, the punctual performance of contracts, and the diffusion of knowledge would all be within the scope of the power; for all of them bear an intimate relation to commerce. The result would be, that the powers of congress would embrace the widest extent of legislative functions, to the utter demolition of all constitutional boundaries between the state and national governments." —Justice Joseph Story, Commerce Clause (1.8.3), 1833.
Many lawmakers need to lose their job under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment for rebelling against the federal government’s constitutionally limited powers by making bills that unconstitutionally expand the already unconstitutionally big federal government’s powers imo.
"14th Amendment, Section 3: No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same [emphases added], or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability."
Proclaiming your a champion of the working class suckers you bleed to death, all the while enriching you and yours.
You had better come to know your maker, because you will soon meet Him face to face.
And it will be by the leftards hand, who's behind you are licking.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.