Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BREAKING: SCOTUS GIVES GA, MI, WI, AND PA UNTIL THURSDAY DEC 10 AT 3PM TO RESPOND TO SUIT BROUGHT BY TEXAS
Twitter ^ | 8 Dec 20 | Anonymous Patriot

Posted on 12/08/2020 5:59:53 PM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-314 last
To: MHGinTN
I’m going to take a nap and await the evening bombshells.. Signing off ...

Wonder is we can see what was submitted by the 4 states?

301 posted on 12/10/2020 12:11:19 PM PST by Fawn ("My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge" Hosea 4:6)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

You can go to https://www.supremecourt.gov/docket/docket.aspx and fill in the case number of 22O155 and see the responses that have been filed.


302 posted on 12/10/2020 12:14:47 PM PST by Stormy_MS1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: Fawn

Here yah go

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html


303 posted on 12/10/2020 12:34:14 PM PST by TeleStraightShooter (SARS-Cov-{Flu} infects like a flu with pRRa amino acid INSERT and it infects like a coronavirus cold)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: TeleStraightShooter; Jane Long

106 members of Congress have joined the lawsuit!


304 posted on 12/10/2020 12:45:37 PM PST by Brown Deer (America First!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: Brown Deer

Anyone have a current list of states signed on?


305 posted on 12/10/2020 1:11:27 PM PST by traderrob6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6

https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/22o155.html


306 posted on 12/10/2020 1:26:39 PM PST by Brown Deer (America First!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Fury

That’s funny. I heard on the radio today that both Thomas and Alito said it should be heard.


307 posted on 12/10/2020 2:28:57 PM PST by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: a real Sheila

They did respond.


308 posted on 12/10/2020 2:30:58 PM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel (No weapon formed against me shall prosper! (Isaiah 54:17))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

They did respond.


309 posted on 12/10/2020 2:31:39 PM PST by SamAdams76 (Orange Man GOOD!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: Fury
But the court is reviewing this case. In the decision that Justice Thomas was dissenting on the court did not even allow the plaintiff to file a Bill of Complaint. Texas has filed theirs.

And just because Justice Thomas thinks a case should be heard is not necessarily meaningful. Every single 9 to 0 decision against the plaintiff in an appeals case started when at least four justices thought the case should be heard. We have no idea what the justices are thinking on this case, nor should we.

310 posted on 12/10/2020 2:41:11 PM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 290 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Re: 310 - Agreed. I think the difference this time is the nature of the case and the issues it touches upon and the change in the makeup of the Court.

I mentioned Thomas specifically because after reading his reasoning in that dissent, I thought he had a compelling argument. but both sides think they have a compelling argument in legal proceedings.

And also mentioned Thomas because ACLJ goofed on what Thomas stated in his dissent.


311 posted on 12/10/2020 4:33:42 PM PST by Fury (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 310 | View Replies]

To: ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas

I believe AZ and NV didn’t have SecofStates who went around their legislatures and created new election “laws.” The 4 states in question did.


312 posted on 12/10/2020 4:49:22 PM PST by BlackFemaleArmyColonel (No weapon formed against me shall prosper! (Isaiah 54:17))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: BlackFemaleArmyColonel

Yeah, that’s not to say that what happened in az and nv was OK, but may they would not be consistent with the lawsuit.


313 posted on 12/10/2020 8:16:17 PM PST by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (Re-imagine the media!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: SecondAmendment

The PA vote was 8 to 0. I would not be too surprised that a similar vote might happen to NOT deal with the Texas issue.


314 posted on 12/11/2020 9:50:33 AM PST by gleeaikin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300301-314 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson