Trump lawyers suffer embarrassing rebukes from judges over voter fraud claims

Washington Post ^ | Nov 11, 2020 | Aaron Blake

[CodeToad]

Just more Fake News from the communists.

[pbear8]

[rintintin]

Have the Washington Post or the New York Times waded through them?

Probably not. I wish the Trump people were better at PR and messaging. They should have an executive summary that we could all easily read and understand. And names of people who should be indicted.

[Gamecock]

Al Gore challenging the 2000 election: Noble
Hildabeast challenging the 2016 election: Seeking the truth
Trump in 2020: A threat to the Republic.

[Lazamataz]

Have the Washington Post or the New York Times waded through them? Probably not. I wish the Trump people were better at PR and messaging.

Utterly impossible, when you are in the sphere of the NYT or WaPo.

[Lazamataz]

The most famous scene came in Pennsylvania, where a Trump lawyer strained to avoid acknowledging that their people were, in fact, allowed to observe the vote-counting process in Philadelphia:

Yes, from 100 feet away, with papered-up windows, and a forklift blocking the view.

That is, on the occasions where the dems hadn't pretended to stop counting and sent the Republican observers home.

Who's zooming who, propagandist?

[Robert DeLong]

The basis for the complaint is that thy refused them until they were forced into letting observers in, and once they did they were as far as a 100 feet away. Some poll watchers were denied saying they were not on the list, even after showing them the credentials that said they were poll watchers. Then if they left to go grab a bite to eat they were denied reentry.

So yeah, they had reasons.

[Steve_Seattle]

Thanks.

[Steve_Seattle]

"Probably not. I wish the Trump people were better at PR and messaging. They should have an executive summary that we could all easily read and understand. And names of people who should be indicted."

Sidney Powell was on Fox last night and seemed confident. I gathered that the issue is multi-faceted, and that they are accumulating a lot of documentation.

A few nights ago, Kenneth Starr was on the Levin show and declared that the last-minute election changes in several states were a violation of both the state constitutions and the federal constitution. So it is probably not something that can be easily summarized. It is much easier for the left to say that it is all "baseless." You can do that on one page and in one sentence, without having to rebut - much less consider - any specific complaints or any specific evidence.

[Bonemaker]

“But it looks like observers were allowed in to observe the counting.”

From the balcony.

[Jonny7797]

I don’t care, and expect Trump to lose local court cases along the way to the only place that matters, the USSC.

[Chode]

[Ohioan]

Mockery & the brazen lie. The same technique since the corruption of Eve in the garden.

[cyn]

// Is It True? Or Did You Read It In The Washington Post? //

Lol.

The hyperbole must be appreciated here:

“ By now, it’s *well-established* that most of the arguments put forward by President Trump’s reelection campaign in its challenge of the results of the 2020 election are *baseless* and *highly speculative*. Even Trump allies, as The Washington Post reported late Tuesday, acknowledge the apparent *futility of the effort*...”

Where’s the rolling eyes emoji?

[BigEdLB]

They were not allowed close access. This is a Washington Post spin article. The adjectives used in the article is Wappo spin, and you are falling for it

[McGruff]

Boy the MSM is all in on this one. This is not the election fraud you were looking for...ZAP

[McGruff]

[Crucial]

Psychological warfare by Washington Post...

[BigEdLB]

Not in any meaningful way.

This is a Wappo spin article... Thank you

[Falconspeed]

Embarrassment will be felt by everyone promoting Biden’s fake victory.