Trump lawyers suffer embarrassing rebukes from judges over voter fraud claims

Washington Post ^ | Nov 11, 2020 | Aaron Blake

[cgbg]

Do you believe the mass media or your lying eyes?

:-(

[Captainpaintball]

Mark Steyn, yesterday, mentioned trump’s own lawyers are stabbing him in the back. Of course, mark levin, his recent enemy and and competitor admonished steyn, not by name, and said the lawyers-including his wife- are doing just fine. Any excuse to get a few digs into the guy you are in court against, i guess.

[vigilante2]

This is the Washington Compost

[SES1066]

Trump lost one suite, therefore all baseless. Of course no mention on the SCOTUS order.

I'm sorry but this is bad spellcheck! It is 'suit' as in lawsuit. A suite is a group of rooms, like a master (oops) suite!

As for WaPo and truth, paging Nick Sandman!

[Kid Shelleen]

Unlike Trump being a Russian asset or Brett Kavanaugh being in on gang rapes election fraud is totally baseless.

[topher]

Dump your typical ‘dump on conservatives’ articles from the compost pile known as WaPo...

[Yo-Yo]

I’m kind of confused, as this story was written today, but the ruling was last week. And the polling place refused to honor the 60 observer “compromise.”

[dware]

Of course no mention on the SCOTUS order.

I think I heard mention of that in one article here on FR. Nothing more. Is it true?

[Golden Eagle]

Embarrassing is posting this outdated garbage here.

[OttawaFreeper]

That was probably that silly piece the NYT wrote about the lawyers who were likely Democrats trash talking the litigation efforts. Steyn was that bit silly by making that kind of a call.

[rintintin]

Unless I see a one-page, easy to read press release from the Trump lawyers , naming who needs to be indicted for criminal vote tampering, and how many votes they manufactured or erased, those hundreds of pages of affidavits don’t do much for me. Have you waded through them?

[politicket]

But it looks like observers were allowed in to observe the counting.

Not in any meaningful way.

I was a poll observer in Colorado - never got close than 20-30 feet. Couldn't see anything except the general process.

[TeddyRay]

I’m getting on the zoom for the hearing right now!

[PghBaldy]

Can people reasonably read ballots from over six feet away?

[Red Badger]

WaPo?

C’mon, Man!.............

[Steve_Seattle]

"But it looks like observers were allowed in to observe the counting. And Trump’s team acknowledged same."

There must have been some basis for this specific complaint to have been made in the first place. I assume the lawyers don't want to waste their time when they don't have a case.

I'm suspecting that the article leaves out key information. For example, perhaps observers were allowed to be in the room, but not to be close enough, or in sufficient numbers, to observe what was actually happening. There is video evidence that that occurred in some places.

[Slyfox]

Then there is stone-cold karma.

Three of the lawyers who were on the GOP team fighting the 2000 Bush-Gore election chads were Gorsuch, Kavanaugh and Barrett. Another lawyer involved was Ted Cruz.

From Corey's Digs.

[Steve_Seattle]

"Unless I see a one-page, easy to read press release from the Trump lawyers , naming who needs to be indicted for criminal vote tampering, and how many votes they manufactured or erased, those hundreds of pages of affidavits don’t do much for me. Have you waded through them?"

Have the Washington Post or the New York Times waded through them? How do they know they are "baseless" if they have not, or if they have not been filed in court and rejected as baseless?

[Islander7]

“a nonzero number of people in the room,”

What a jackass! Yeah, one observer amount 300 dem operatives. This was just discussed on Rush.

[TalBlack]

The Left have spent years draining the gov’t institutions of their moral authority. This won’t end even if EVERY judge or court rules against the president. Who the hell with any brains thinks judges are intellectually honest in general?

Remember the common observation, on here, that the Demons HAD to win? Well, NOW we HAVE to address the attack on the Constitution which has just occurred. We have no choice. To fail to rise now is to let be a thing which has happened...the end of America.

An irresistible force is about to meet an immovable object...