Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vehicle Mounted Laser Guns are Here and will be Fielded Soon
AmmoLand ^ | 23 September, 2020 | Dean Weingarten

Posted on 09/26/2020 4:47:45 AM PDT by marktwain

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last
To: RedMonqey

I love that movie.

My friend got married not long after and we had the “walk down the aisle” outdoors.

So I had everyone in the processional singing “Doo Wah Diddy” in time — I did the main part of course :)


41 posted on 09/26/2020 9:20:01 AM PDT by freedumb2003 ("Do not mistake activity for achievement." - John Wooden)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Another movie which could never be made due to “political correctness” The Left is a humorless lot, makes the Puritans look like “Animal House” (Another movie that couldn’t be made today)


42 posted on 09/26/2020 9:51:47 AM PDT by RedMonqey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
...It was the Air Borne Laser (ABL) it is mentioned in the article...

There is more than a little wishful thinking in that article. ABL was never ready to be fielded.

There has always been a lot of very expensive and very risky (in the sense that the technological path chosen might not work out) development ahead of any large laser system.

It was initially for use against Theater Ballistic Missiles (SCUDs and the like) the potential for use against ICBMs is there but never tested. And, in order to work it had to hit the missile in boost phase. It is not effective against re-entry vehicles.

Do you really think Russia or China is going to let us permanently station a fleet of 747s with lasers over their territory? It is a whole lot easier to shoot down missiles with a theoretical laser and a keyboard than with a real laser and enemy missiles.

One of the things I never liked about it is that it was a chemical laser which inherently produces a very dirty beam that must be "cleaned up" by reflecting it back and forth through a series of mirrors inside the aircraft. Now think about this -- you have a laser beam powerful enough to burn through a missile at a range of several hundred miles bouncing around inside a flying aircraft. If anything goes wrong it is going to destroy the aircraft.

You do not want to be part of that crew.

43 posted on 09/26/2020 9:57:55 AM PDT by CurlyDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Lasers are now useful,Buck Rogers has last laugh told ya.


44 posted on 09/26/2020 10:56:57 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel
I’d love to take the EM-50 on a trip to Portland.

Yep. And take the girls. Give them the "Aunt Jemima" treatment.

45 posted on 09/28/2020 7:59:12 AM PDT by Spirochete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Sounds like something the Space Force will be looking into. Not sure about taking out ICBMs from orbit, but other satellites might be targeted.


46 posted on 09/28/2020 8:39:19 AM PDT by gundog ( Hail to the Chief, bitches!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: servantboy777
I recall a piece in Soldier of Fortune that said rifle -mounted lasers had no future. The one pictured was about the size of a wine bottle.
47 posted on 09/28/2020 8:42:42 AM PDT by gundog ( Hail to the Chief, bitches!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: marktwain
Lasers are now useful, but limited weapons.

The U.S. military technology in lasers is on the cusp of being significantly more useful in shooting down drones, mortar shells, and artillery shells. It is on the edge of providing a defense against hypersonic weapons.

The use of Stingray to deny optics to aimed and guided weaponry was nothing to sneeze at.

48 posted on 10/08/2020 12:38:08 PM PDT by archy (Since we never got President Patton, we'll have to make do with President Trump.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson