“President Putin directed and influenced [a] campaign to erode the faith and confidence of the American people in our presidential election process. Second, that he did so to demean Secretary Clinton, and third, that he sought to advantage Mr. Trump.””
“But but...you say the Russians fed blackmail info to Trump. Wouldn’t the piss-gate dossier hurt Trump and help Hillary?”
Ohhh... (thinking thinking) Uhmmm, well, the Russians just want to sow discord and make everyone hate everyone. Yeah, yeah... that’s the ticket. /s
“only a witness”
........
Yup, that means he was present during unlawful communications......
........
That means Brennan is a heart beat away from a conspiracy rap, if he doesn’t start singing.
.........
You can bet he was represented by counsel at the questioning.
.........
One false or misleading answer and it’s a perjury trap at least.
No. EG, Flynn. Never said a word to him and did not advise him of his rights. Brennan had his lawyer present, so no need to advise him of anything...in my opinion.
Durham was originally an Obama appointee....
Spin. Spin? Oh no.. The left never spends.
Whatever Brennan did....they pushed it off and the statute of limitations ran out.
Horse$hit.
Durahm isn’t going to interview a random witness for eight hours because they’re not a target of anything.
If Brennan was told he’s not a target he would have not even shown up or walked the second someone said that, so as to keep the hoax as intact as possible.
He doesn’t care about the appearance of cooperation with Bar. He’s a crook, he’d bounce and then tell everyone he stayed and answered every question.
He’s been caught and more charges will be coming. Simple answer is the most likely.
Yes. It is the equivalent of warning that one has the right to remain silent.
Horse$hit.
Durahm isn’t going to interview a random witness for eight hours because they’re not a target of anything.
If Brennan was told he’s not a target he would have not even shown up or walked the second someone said that, so as to keep the hoax as intact as possible.
He doesn’t care about the appearance of cooperation with Bar. He’s a crook, he’d bounce and then tell everyone he stayed and answered every question.
He’s been caught and more charges will be coming. Simple answer is the most likely.
Didn’t Comey tell Trump that?
The correct verbiage should be. “You are not a target of a criminal probe...at this time”.
Hey Adolph, I just want you to be aware that we will be landing about 150,000 soldiers between June 3-5 in Normandy, between Verreville and Cabourg
Well, Mueller told Trump the same thing, but that was clearly a lie. Unfortunately Durham was probably telling the truth.
Of course, any LEO can lie to you.
Durham is just ANOTHER DEMOCRAT, I guess. PATHETIC !
If you lie to the Feds, you are in deep trouble.
If the Feds lie their ass off to you, no problem.
Until indictments come down, my operating procedure is to
consider no Leftist/democRat supporter to be a target.
Whole lost of smoke. Glowing embers. Raging forest fire.
But after review, nothing was even hot.
Oh but sure, indictments are coming down any minute now.
I’ve been assured for what now, the last three decades?
Bulldoze it clean withing hours folks. No one will
dare to ask.
I wonder if that’s true. He should be.
Durham said nothing nor will he. No leaks means no leaks.
“Not a target....” (at this time)