Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: servo1969

By whom is it “contested”?

I thought the problem was the pinko judge.


3 posted on 07/30/2020 11:09:23 AM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: BenLurkin

Yes, Emmitt, the Snake, Sullivan contested the 3-Judge Appeals court decision to vacate the Flynn case. Now, the whole Appeals court came back and said...YOu GO Emmitt...get this bastard Flynn in prison!


9 posted on 07/30/2020 11:14:48 AM PDT by MCEscherHammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Exactly! The judge has no standing to contest the dismissal because he is not a party to the case.

FOX is just writing BS headlines for the narrative.


52 posted on 07/30/2020 4:30:07 PM PDT by Valpal1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: BenLurkin

Sullivan asked for the en banc hearing after the 3-judge panel told him to drop it. Took them a while to make this decision and I’m betting that, behind closed doors, they wish that he had just followed the original order.

The oral arguments for the en banc review will take place on August 11, but that might present problems for the appellate circuit too. The DoJ keeps finding more evidence of investigatory misconduct related to the prosecution of Flynn, and that is arguably already rising to the level where a judge would apply harsh sanctions to the prosecution of a case — if prosecutors didn’t withdraw the charges first, that is.


89 posted on 07/31/2020 6:20:04 AM PDT by qaz123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson