Posted on 07/05/2020 7:25:07 PM PDT by Enlightened1
I think this means that the accused (defendant) requested materials from the accuser (prosecution) that would be essential for the defense. Judge stepped in and rather than having the prosecution produce the exculpatory evidence, and rather than having a special master review what materials might be relevant to the requested, and rather than requiring the evidence be secured for the future ....
Chose the most aggressive option in ordering the destruction of the evidence.
Do I have a somewhat clear understanding? If this is the case, it seems HIGHLY suspicious.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.