Posted on 06/27/2020 5:38:11 AM PDT by Sir Napsalot
Friday on Fox News Channel, “Fox News Sunday” anchor Chris Wallace said despite President Donald Trump’s claims of fraud in mail-in voting, there “isn’t a history of fraud with mail-in voting.”
Wallace said, “They were two points I’d think about that. One, I have considered a lot of other groups; there just isn’t a history of fraud with mail-in voting—fewer than 1,000 cases since 2000 with billions of votes cast. So I think it is for 500 cases and all of them very minor and the fraud doesn’t particularly advantage one party or the other. ...
Trump tweeted, “Because of MAIL-IN BALLOTS, 2020 will be the most RIGGED Election in our nation’s history – unless this stupidity is ended. We voted during World War One & World War Two with no problem, but now they are using COVID in order to cheat by using Mail-Ins!”
Wallace said, “I guess the other point I would make, the president says we voted in World War I and we voted in World War II, yes, those were huge crises for the country, but it had nothing to do with voting. People weren’t going to get attacked by the Germans because they were voting. But there is a danger obviously of COVID and the spread of the disease with voting in person this time. So I’m not quite sure I understand the point there when it comes to people voting during world wars.”
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...
I want to make two points, too -
1) "fewer than 1,000 cases since 2000 with billions of votes cast" ====> Is that believable? Hey, Wallace, LOOK HARDER on mail-in fraud. You are a 'journalist', you are supposedly being paid to do investigative journalism.
2) The point of voting in WWs is that we didn't suspend the Constitution in each war even though those are more substantial crises than the current covid. And Wallace purposely ignored Wisconsin primary and covid cases (there was no spike).
All to do the bidding of his masters. Chris Wallace, sad tiny human being.
Of course there is.
I watched it and I heard about it in two different states.
Of course there is.
I watched it and I heard about it in two different states.
“with billions of votes cast.”
Really?
Chris Wallace likely tried selling ocean front lots located in the Dakotas as a vocation before settling on being a journalist.
No fraud? LOL!
Oregon sends out 2 ballots to every democrat.
Wallace is lying.
(clears throat)
Are there still Republicans/conservatives left in Oregon?
/don’t kill me, just making bad joke
How many votes in Fla determined the outcome of the 2000 presidential election?
How many seats in Congress have been lost to Dems counting and recounting the votes?
Not obtuse, he’s lying.
Not a fool, just simply a
tool.
Wallace always lies, except sometimes when
he is interrupting someone making a point.
“there just isn’t a history of fraud with mail-in voting—fewer than 1,000 cases since 2000 with billions of votes cast.”
OK, 1,000 cases since 2000, and how many races were stolen by those 1,000 cases?
You could vote out every single Congress Critter with less than 600 cases!
Wallace needs to be shipped off to CNN where he would be right at home with the other Trump haters. One thing about Chris Wallace is he sure inherited his Father, Mike Wallace’s liberal genes. I like to watch Fox, but when he appears, I either change stations or turn the sound off.
“””there “isn’t a history of fraud with mail-in voting.”””
‘HALF THE STORY’ Wallace needs to move to the New York Times where his talents are needed on a daily basis.
Wallace conveniently ignores the glaring fact that ‘there isn’t a history of mail-in ballots being sent to everybody that is on the voter registration rolls’.
Ignorance is bliss, WallaceIdiot can testify to this.
Please call the commies and anarchists out in face value.
Wallace is one of the conspirators.
He is part of their efforts.
My two concerns at the moment.
1. Mail in votes and no oversight.
2. Governor Abbot and whether he has switched side w or is blackmailed...and no one at Freep is talking about it!
I sure don’t trust Chris Wallace & won’t put much stock in anything he says. Right now the Democrats seem to be pushing mail-in voting. Firstly, this tells me to be immediately suspicious of anything they are pushing because of past experience. Secondly...and I’ve heard this mentioned several times...why are they pushing mail-in voting yet giving a pass on all the protests,rioting & looting; where there is a heavy congregation of people? Wouldn’t that be a cause of spreading the virus? They seem to be really concerned about the corona virus & yet the stuff they are allowing says otherwise. If mail-in voting would slow the spread of disease, wouldn’t the opposite effect be noted within the crowds of protestors & all that goes with that? That tells me that there are other motives for suggesting mail-in voting. We don’t need to make it any easier for those who would falsify voting because they know that’s the only way they could win.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.