Posted on 06/25/2020 2:10:06 AM PDT by familyop
Greater New York Black Lives Matter president Hawk Newsome joined "The Story" Wednesday to discuss the direction of the movement...
"You ... have said that violence is sometimes necessary in these situations," host Martha MacCallum told Newsome. "What exactly is it that you hope to achieve through violence?"...
"I said," Newsome told the host, "if this country doesn't give us what we want, then we will burn down this system and replace it. All right? And I could be speaking ... figuratively. I could be speaking literally. It's a matter of interpretation...
At the conclusion of the interview, Newsome told MacCallum, "I just want black liberation and black sovereignty, by any means necessary."
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
At the conclusion of the interview, Newsome told MacCallum, “I just want black liberation and black sovereignty, by any means necessary.”
So what makes him any different than a white supremacist advocating for White Sovereignty? Is anyone thinking critically today?!
Downtown Madison not safe following unrest in city, sheriff reportedly says
https://www.foxnews.com/us/sheriff-declares-downtown-madison
He wants separation (they’ve always wanted it) between the races but blacks can’t survive without the help of White taxpayers. Abe Lincoln planned to send them to Liberia and Senegal. Let’s implement his original plan.
Separate yet feeding from the white trough given to them by the demonrat plantation owners
Correct!
This guy should be picked up and questioned.
Black sovereignty? Does that mean a return of Jim Crowe and segregation? Paging George Wallace.
I have always thought re-segregation was the way to go.
No one at all on the Left, from what I see.
I watched that interview last night. Do you even realize how stupid that statement was when spoken? Whoever interviews this fool needs to follow up on his "it's a matter of interpretation." The "I could be speaking literally." Should have been followed up with, 'Are you speaking literally?' ... It was HIS words that were spoken! He definitely could have clarified his own words and what he meant! We know the Marxists are totally trying to destroy the country.
What he's saying is "we will not stop burning and looting until you make us happy".
I think an increasing number of people are thinking "They will NEVER be happy, so our families and property will never be safe until every single one of them is dead".
Bring it tough guy. Why don’t you bring your BS protest to my neighborhood? I don’t think it will work out too well for you.....
Much like NOW their goal IS to ‘burn down the system’ and usher in Marxism.
It shouldn’t be ‘a matter of interpretation’.
That would be MIS- interpretation.
What was his intent in that incendiary statement?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.