Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Maybe It’s Time To Privatize The Police
The Federalist ^ | June 18, 2020 | David Marcus

Posted on 06/18/2020 8:22:09 AM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last
To: Bratch

You already have that.

You have folks hiring agitators to crash campaign rallies, to incite violence or provoke it... You have folks hired to intimidate at polling stations...

Privatizing police doesn’t change that. Besides, Hitlers storm troopers coincided with a state that still had a public police like we have.


41 posted on 06/18/2020 8:31:58 PM PDT by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Amberdawn

And none of that will change if we privatize police. It’s not an either or world. Politicians AND police can both be responsible.


42 posted on 06/19/2020 7:11:01 AM PDT by discostu (I know that's a bummer baby, but it's got precious little to do with me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Red6

I agree with you about the perfidy of politicians. My point is that civilian review boards exist and politicians get involved in controversial police actions, so why are bad cops still being protected? Someone isn’t doing the job they’re supposed to. Instead of stupidly defunding police, how about these CRB’s, PD’s and politicians do their jobs?


43 posted on 06/19/2020 12:28:29 PM PDT by Amberdawn (Want To Honor Our Troops? Then Be A Citizen Worth Fighting For.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Imo, it’s more about time to start letting our crooked and incompetent politicers get acquainted with the gallows.

The root of the problem isn’t in the police. The root of the problem is in the political and corruption pressures that impact management of police and infest police leadership as political managers are promoted within the police.

Privatizing doesn’t solve a thing. Just creates new layers of things to go wrong and get out of control.

And then there’s the cost of doing business with humans and anything designed and populated with humans. There’s always gonna be scumbags that work their way into the system no matter how careful the checks and screens.

Motivating police, and police unions to be much more pro-active on screening out scumbags from their ranks would go a long way to helping the rest of the pop keep the faith in police and policing.


44 posted on 06/19/2020 12:33:09 PM PDT by Grimmy (equivocation is but the first step along the road to capitulation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Well, no. If I need a cop I need a cop. Will we also adopt pure constitutional carry?


45 posted on 06/21/2020 3:53:16 AM PDT by gogeo (It isn't just time to open America up again: It's time to be America again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amberdawn

I do not understand your point entirely. Please explain.


46 posted on 06/21/2020 12:23:55 PM PDT by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I bet if you had a private police (contracts where firms bid on them) you would get two ultimate outcomes:

1. Significantly lower costs.
2. Greater focus on how the community perceives the police, i.e. they want to keep the contract and are more responsive to the communities perceptions regards policing.

The police today is no magical entity. They are just another government organization may it be public schools, the USPS, or the VA. The average cop has no concept that the person they are interfacing with on the street is actually paying their salary and they would laugh if that were pointed out to them. There is a complete disconnect between customer and service provider, massive bureaucracy and inefficiency, a lot of political meddling, and absolutely no cost-benefit (ROI), real risk analysis or innovation at work. A police department is like a USPS with guns, and yes, you can privatize most of law enforcement.

Have vets generally benefited or lost as more private sector services have become available to them?

Has the public generally benefited or lost as private logistics firms like FEDEX, DHL and UPS entered the market?

Law Enforcement isn’t some magical realm where only a government solution is viable. No more so than those that support public schools and think there shouldn’t be vouchers, home schooling etc. BTW, how do private schools and home schooling stack up against public schools?

Government run = inefficient, non-customer responsive (you get what we give you and be happy with that), political, non-innovative (yesterdays technology tomorrow), expensive... Tell me anything government run that is a bench mark of efficiency?


47 posted on 06/21/2020 12:47:56 PM PDT by Red6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson