Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Air Force to Test Fighter Drone Against Human Pilot
Air Force Magazine ^ | 4 June 2020 | Rachel Cohen

Posted on 06/05/2020 10:34:07 AM PDT by Alas Babylon!

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Titanium shell drone swarms targeting engine intakes. Only need 1 to be ingested.


41 posted on 06/05/2020 1:11:10 PM PDT by USCG SimTech
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ByteMercenary
Not a bad movie actually ...

I may try to find it don't think it is in my library.

42 posted on 06/05/2020 7:40:07 PM PDT by itsahoot (Welcome to the New USA where Islam is a religion of peace and Christianity is a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

You know human pilots outsmart drones known as guided missiles by jamming the signals and deploying countermeasures, right? It’s also a concept that you could have guided missiles that follow the drone control signal to the drone itself.


43 posted on 06/13/2020 9:09:21 AM PDT by Morpheus2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Morpheus2009
You know human pilots outsmart drones known as guided missiles by jamming the signals and deploying countermeasures, right?

Some missiles are guided through terminal homing to the target by RF illumiation. Others have onboard seekers and do it themselves using RF or other means. Not sure what your point is. Mine is that if the 'pilot' is a guy on the ground controlling the aircraft as it makes high speed maneuvers then that RF better never be jammed or lost by atmospheric effects. He needs instantaneous communications to the aircraft. I mean he moves the stick and the aircraft responds instantaneously just like he was sitting in the cockpit. You have some delay with a line of sight RF link, you have a LOT of delay with a satcom link. So he'd have to be close which is unrealistic. Basically you either let the AI fly it or you keep a man in the cockpit, flying it from the ground defeats the purpose of making it unmanned in the first place and adds a level of complexity and unreliability.

The point is that the best you could expect is to have a controller on the ground fly it from waypoint to waypoint but if it needs to be high speed maneuvering like in a dogfight the AI takes over and does it locally so the aircraft can hit peak maneuvers that would cause a human pilot to turn to jelly (which is the point of not having a human in the cockpit in the first place). At that point the controller on the ground's role is only deciding whether to authorize the AI to take a shot or not. Which seems to me to be the best model. AI flies faster and "better" (i.e. pulls higher Gs, etc) and makes faster decisions than a human can but can only shoot if a human in the loop turns it loose to do so.

44 posted on 06/13/2020 9:57:57 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson