Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Thousands Of Churches Are About To Defy Lockdown Orders. Itís About Time
The Federalist ^ | May 22, 2020 | John Daniel Davidson

Posted on 05/22/2020 2:17:59 PM PDT by Kaslin

Churchgoers across the country are reasserting their fundamental rights of conscience—rights that too many political leaders have forgotten or denied.


On Friday, President Trump said churches and houses of worship are “essential” and called on governors nationwide to allow them to open this weekend. If they don’t, Trump said he would “override” governors, citing forthcoming guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

In remarks Thursday, the president criticized some governors who have “deemed liquor stores and abortion clinics as essential” but not churches. “It’s not right. So I’m correcting this injustice and calling houses of worship essential.”

Trump is right, but churches are already taking action on their own. This week in Minnesota, thousands of Catholics and Lutherans will gather in their churches in defiance of the governor, whose plan for reopening the state relegates churches and houses of worship to the status of tattoo parlors and hair salons.

It’s about time. Democratic Gov. Tim Walz is plainly violating the Constitution with his order, which limits attendance at religious services to 10 people, inside or outside. Meanwhile, places like Walmart and Home Depot and a host of other types of businesses deemed “essential” by the governor’s office are allowed to operate at half-capacity.

On its face, that’s discrimination against religious exercise, and it’s illegal. Someone should tell Walz that you can’t just issue edicts that treat churches differently than other entities and expect to get away with it.

Minnesota Archbishop Bernard Hebda and Rev. Lucas Woodford, president of the Minnesota South District of the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod, as well as dozens of smaller evangelical churches across the state, are unquestionably correct in their view that the governor has no authority in law to prevent them from gathering. (These churches, it’s worth noting, plan to comply with all social distancing and other safety guidelines, including limiting their churches to one-third capacity—going above and beyond what’ required for malls and other retail stores.)

Hebda and Woodford aren’t taking this lightly. The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty, a non-profit law firm representing the churches, has noted that the churches have had “extensive correspondence” with the governor’s office in hopes of negotiating a compromise. The decision to open in defiance of the order was made only after those attempts failed.

Eric Rassbach, vice president and senior counsel at Becket, told the Washington Post that the churches are not waiting to file a legal appeal because Walz’s order treats churches unequally and is therefore illegal. “If it’s illegal, you don’t have a duty to follow it,” he said.

Churches In California Also About to Defy Their Governor

Rassbach is right—and the point about unequal treatment is no less true elsewhere in the country than it is in Minnesota. Last week, thousands of pastors in California signed a letter—a “declaration of essentiality”—addressed to Gov. Gavin Newsom declaring their intention to reopen their churches on May 31, with or without the governor’s consent.

Under Newsom’s reopening plan, churches are placed in the same category as hair salons, gyms, and other places deemed to be high-risk. The governor’s office has offered no plausible explanation for why churches are included in this group, likely because there is none.

The California churches have been buoyed by a letter last week issued by the U.S. Department of Justice to Newsom warning that the governor’s planned reopening “facially discriminates against religious exercise. California has not shown why interactions in offices and studios of the entertainment industry, and in-person operations to facilitate nonessential ecommerce, are included on the list as being allowed with social distancing where telework is not practical, while gatherings with social distancing for purposes of religious worship are forbidden, regardless of whether remote worship is practical or not.”

The letter goes on to say that although the Justice Department “does not seek to dictate how States such as California determine what degree of activity and personal interaction should be allowed to protect the safety of their citizens,” it is nevertheless “charged with upholding the Constitution and federal statutory protections for civil rights,” and that, “Whichever level of restrictions you adopt, these civil rights protections mandate equal treatment of persons and activities of a secular and religious nature.”

Religious Freedom Is the Bedrock of U.S. Constitutionalism

Setting aside the fact that broad lockdown orders are no longer constitutionally justified, there’s no excuse for governors and mayors to target religious worshippers as they have from Mississippi to New York City over the course of the pandemic.

That so many governors and mayors have done so betrays a dangerous ignorance, or perhaps indifference, about the place of religious freedom and freedom of conscience in our constitutional system. That indifference is best captured in the infamous line last month from New Jersey’s Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy after he allowed arrests at religious services, that the Bill of Rights is above his “pay grade” and that he “wasn’t thinking of the Bill of Rights when we did this.”

He certainly wasn’t, but he should have been. The Bill of Rights is the bedrock of our system of government. Protecting it and upholding the Constitution is included in the pay grade of every single elected official in the country, from the White House to City Hall.

The right not to be discriminated against because of your religious beliefs, or lack thereof, is indispensable to our civic life, pandemic or not. At the end of Thomas Jefferson’s life, in typical Jeffersonian fashion he designed his own tombstone and wrote his own epitaph: “Author of the Declaration of American Independence / of the Statute of Virginia for Religious Freedom / and Father of the University of Virginia.”

It’s easy to see why Jefferson included the Declaration, which gave birth to a new nation, and the University of Virginia, which was—and is—a monument to his genius. But why include a state statute for religious freedom?

Because Jefferson understood what Walz, Newsom, Murphy and others have forgotten or rejected: that “our rulers can have authority over such natural rights only as we have submitted to them. The rights of conscience we never submitted, we could not submit. We are answerable for them to God.”


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; US: California; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: 1stamendment; bfrl; billofrights; businesssanctuary; catholicchurch; church; citizensovereignty; defiance; essentialbusinesses; essentialworkers; firstamendment; freedomofassembly; freedomofrelgion; gavinnewsom; lockdowns; lutheranchurch; missourisynod; mutinyonthebounty; religiousfreedom; reopen; thomasjefferson; usconstitution; wuhancoronavirus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 05/22/2020 2:17:59 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It’s about time!!!


2 posted on 05/22/2020 2:22:37 PM PDT by LiveFreeOrDie2001 (God Bless President Trump!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Onward! Christian Soldiers!!


3 posted on 05/22/2020 2:22:52 PM PDT by Oscar in Batangas ( January 20, 2017, High Noon. The end of an error.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It would not surprise me if democrat governors planted covid carriers in churches. Isn’t that their SOP with nursing homes?


4 posted on 05/22/2020 2:23:21 PM PDT by pnut22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnut22

And with so many grey hairs in the churches, that’s a dangerous idea. Unfortunately, also plausible.


5 posted on 05/22/2020 2:24:31 PM PDT by slowhandluke (It's hard to be cynical enough in this age.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

As posted on another thread: Any so-called “Christian” that even thinks about voting for a devil-worshipping, commie RAT is totally insane.
“REMEMBER IN NOVEMBER!!!” Every single Christian needs to get out and vote for the POTUS. ALL of em....flood the polling places with thousands of Christians to vote for the POTUS.
Those of us that want to “fight fire with fire”, should plan to load up busloads of patriots to flood the Virginia polling places by the thousands to vote. No ID required, no questions asked....just vote! “Hi, I’m Mickey Mouse from Charlottesville and I’m here to VOTE!!”


6 posted on 05/22/2020 2:24:55 PM PDT by lgjhn23 (Libs are a virus.....the DemoVirus!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: slowhandluke

Democrats have no qualms about killing people to get their power.


7 posted on 05/22/2020 2:27:07 PM PDT by pnut22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lgjhn23

But, but, but Trump is a womanizer and he’s loud and says mean things....


8 posted on 05/22/2020 2:27:10 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: lgjhn23

But, but, but Trump is a womanizer and he’s loud and says mean things....


9 posted on 05/22/2020 2:27:10 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It’s about time everyone did.


10 posted on 05/22/2020 2:27:32 PM PDT by TigersEye (If you see me wearing a mask ... don't assume I'm wearing it for Covid-19.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

My criticism of these governors pales in comparison to my criticism of all the “religious leaders” who shut their churches down so quickly when this fiasco started.


11 posted on 05/22/2020 2:31:44 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("And somewhere in the darkness ... the gambler, he broke even.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnut22

Absolutely


12 posted on 05/22/2020 2:32:48 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
New Jersey’s Democratic Gov. Phil Murphy after he allowed arrests at religious services, that the Bill of Rights is above his “pay grade” and that he “wasn’t thinking of the Bill of Rights when we did this.”

Aufträge sind Aufträge

13 posted on 05/22/2020 2:35:34 PM PDT by Capt. Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnut22

They need some of the flock armed to the teeth.


14 posted on 05/22/2020 2:36:37 PM PDT by Vaquero ( Don't pick a fight with an old guy. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

“...But, but, but Trump is a womanizer and he’s loud and says mean things....”
LOL...Yeah....it’s almost comical.
Joe Biden is the real womanizer with pictures to prove it, and he’s loud and says mean things.
One doesn’t vote for Trump because he was/is a “holy saint”. One votes for Trump to “drain the swamp” and to represent the People. It’s President Trump that’s telling the communists to open the churches, synagogues, etc., or else. Christians and Jews need to “Remember in November” who stood up for them and to go vote for the POTUS in droves.


15 posted on 05/22/2020 2:40:52 PM PDT by lgjhn23 (Libs are a virus.....the DemoVirus!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: slowhandluke
And with so many grey hairs in the churches, that’s a dangerous idea. Unfortunately, also plausible.

I leave my grey hairs in the shower drain.
16 posted on 05/22/2020 2:41:02 PM PDT by Old Yeller (The Blessed Hope is imminent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin; All
Essential ... non essential. Quite frankly, can anyone explain to us why any politician is “essential?” A garbage man provides a more essential service than a politician. That being said, their salaries should have stopped the moment they issued a shutdown.

Why are hospitals and clinics shut dow and. Urges now unemployed. I thought this was a medical emergency. I guess not for those needing mammograms, colonoscopies, tumor biopsies, cancer treatment...

So the gal running a hair salon, Or a barber, cafe owner... now shut down, going bankrupt, cannot feed their families are considered, “non essential.” Therefore, according to politicians, the LIVES of these American families are meaningless,

They think “screw them.” I say to the politicians, “Why not line em up in front of an open pit...”

Smug, arrogant bastards.

/rant

17 posted on 05/22/2020 2:42:17 PM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isn’t common anymore.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Exactly - they caved without question! and NOW will not open except with restrictions. I will cry if I see a partition for Holy Communion. God doesn’t want us to FEAR anyone but HIM!

I’m not scared!


18 posted on 05/22/2020 2:43:33 PM PDT by RebelTXRose (Our Lady of Fatima, Pray for us! PRAY THE ROSARY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: pnut22

Would not put it past proggies to do that with “OK Bye Boomers, and God bless you!”


19 posted on 05/22/2020 2:49:05 PM PDT by polymuser (It's discouraging to think how many people are shocked by honesty and so few by deceit. Noel Coward)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

It is time to unlease the power of God! Let the people congregate!

Hebrews 10:24 And let us consider how we may spur one another on toward love and good deeds, 25 not giving up meeting together, as some are in the habit of doing, but encouraging one another—and all the more as you see the Day approaching.

Forbidding the Assembly of the Church is an act against the Constitution of the United States, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”


20 posted on 05/22/2020 2:58:50 PM PDT by richardtavor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson