DNC Responds To Carter Page Lawsuit, Claiming Steele Dossier Is ‘Substantially True’

Daily Caller ^ | 03/21/20 | Chuck Ross

[eyeamok]

“Even if the statements at issue — published by third parties named in Page’s first failed lawsuit — could be attributed to Defendants, those statements were substantially true, and thus cannot be defamatory as a matter of law,” the DNC’s attorneys asserted.

[eyeamok]

This is where the Judge is being played as the FOOL!! If the Judge had half a brain He/She would IMMEDIATELY ORDER the Attorneys to PROVE THIS CLAIM or Face Contempt, 6 months in Jail and a Referral to the BAR Association for PERMANENT DISBARMENT for Perjury, Perpetrating a FRAUD upon the Court, because this is just FALSE and Easily Provable to be FALSE!

[grey_whiskers]

i’m really beginning to look forward to the firing squads.

[datura]

The Purge comes to mind, doesn’t it?

[mumblypeg]

Oh yeah?
Still waiting to see that pee tape that “isn’t defamatory.”

[datura]

Good morning FRiend.

[alloysteel]

“Substantially true” - “Fake but accurate” - “Science not facts”. How many ways can a flat LIE be disguised?

Maybe these people did not invent the careful crafting of fabrications, but they have attempted to raise it to an art form.

[ClearCase_guy]

How does anyone measure “substantially” true?

[xp38]

Nixon era.....at variance with the facts.

[indthkr]

DNC corruption machine - bump for later....

[Michael.SF.]

With an elastic measuring tape ?

[antidemoncrat]

“DNC Responds To Carter Page Lawsuit, Claiming Steele Dossier Is ‘Substantially True’”

Grade “A” BS!

[Phil DiBasquette]

It depends upon what the meaning of the word ‘substantially’ is

[jdsteel]

I look forward to hearing their legal arguments, discovery...the whole shebang.

With the Kung Flu lockdown it would be great to broadcast this thing live.

[Maris Crane]

So What?

If there are LIES ABOUT CARTER PAGE, THEN THEY ARE STILL LIES.

[samadams2000]

Is a response to a lawsuit admissible as evidence if it proves the case?

[MileHi]

“Even if the statements at issue — published by third parties named in Page’s first failed lawsuit — could be attributed to Defendants, those statements were substantially true, and thus cannot be defamatory as a matter of law,” the DNC’s attorneys asserted.

This won't age well.

[Robert357]

Gosh, they have absolutely no shame or honor. Everyone knows it was false. The FISA judges have even found it to have been false and the DNC is arguing the absurd position that it is mostly true? Bring Steel over to the USA for questioning (especially by the FBI, just like they set up Flynn and others to charge with lying to the FBI.)

The good news that Biden is proving to have dementia to just about everyone who listens to him and that the Bernie Bro’s are going to destroy the Democratic Party for decades if he is not the Presidential nominee. They will be destroyed and bankrupt pretty soon.

[Bringbackthedraft]

Calling our 1st witness your honor, “Mr. Rather” please take the stand. s/

[Bringbackthedraft]

They will be destroyed and bankrupt pretty soon. ................ ???, maybe they have someone in the bull pen awaiting her belated turn, with backing from mini Mike and Soros? She could give the party all of her foundation funds just to be #2 on the ballot. Biden would last 2 yrs before he is declared hopeless.

[Don Corleone]

‘Substantially True’

A Little Bit pregnant?