Posted on 02/21/2020 6:23:52 PM PST by Zhang Fei
I think he meant he would want Bloomberg to be the dem nominee possibly
Trump would walk all over Bloomie in a debate.
Trump tweeting is a brilliant idea
It’s the only way to get his ideas out there, the media won’t do it.
He has more followers then anyone else!
We get his ideas etc instantly with out the spin.
Very well said. Thank you.
I totally agree.
The Press (not just print media) have become the Press-titutes. They do it (propaganda) for the money.
Lies 24/7 paid for too often by foreign globalist currency.
They don’t just hate the USA, they hate the Truth, Honesty, Goodness, and everything the USA has always stood for.
Ephesians 6:12
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.”
Drudge Report is Dead. I quit reading it long ago.
Bought like the rest.
100% Lies.
It doesn’t.
He might have said it with sarcasm a foot thick.
Yes. That is possible.
The statement about Clint Esstwood simply does not tie to the reality of his life.
It will eventually come out.
the writer, Tunku Varadarajan, also worked with Politico. he has a number of articles on their website:
July 2017: Politico: Donald Trump and the wrath of Khan
Terrorism, tweets and the souring of a special relationship
by Tunku Varadarajan
Tunku Varadarajan, a contributing editor at POLITICO
https://www.politico.eu/article/donald-trump-and-the-wrath-of-khan/
Wikipedia: Tunku Varadarajan is an English writer and journalist, formerly editor of Newsweek Global and Newsweek International... and a contributing editor at POLITICO Europe...
In 2009, Varadarajan left Forbes for The Daily Beast...
A British citizen, Varadarajan lives in Brooklyn, USA...
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunku_Varadarajan
btw on Varadarajan’s twitter page, he is re-tweeting tweets presuming Eastwood is endorsing Bloomberg for President, without debunking them. latest tweet is mocking the President.
‘Parasite’ studio fires back after Trump criticism: ‘He can’t read’
Twitter: Tunku Varadarajan
https://twitter.com/tunkuv
important to get this around...and get the entire article:
Tweet: Hollywood Reporter 8h ago
Clint Eastwood is expressing some early support for Michael Bloomberg for president
reply
William 7h ago
If you read the WSJ article it’s the very last sentence of the article (I mean the very last sentence) and he just doesn’t like Trumps tweets. Other than that he praised him on policy.
https://twitter.com/THR/status/1231040311239028736
easier to read it here as it is directly under the H’wood Reporter tweet:
Tweet: Hollywood Reporter 8h ago
Clint Eastwood is expressing some early support for Michael Bloomberg for president
reply
William 7h ago
If you read the WSJ article it’s the very last sentence of the article (I mean the very last sentence) and he just doesn’t like Trumps tweets. Other than that he praised him on policy.
https://twitter.com/WilliaminCA/status/1231060336322547715
Yes. He is a Trump hater.
More Fake News.
Compost. They make good compost. Not kidding.
If Trump didn’t tweet and tweak the Leftists and Leftist policy, we would
NEVER know his opinion on things.
We can see how the media, spins, makes stuff up, lies...
These people that can’t get over the idea of Trump tweeting need to think
what the alternative would be.””
EXACTLY
At 89 years of age Eastwood’s “Bloomberg” statement could be signs of early onset Alzheimer’s.
Well Clint, America is at war with leftwing communists who are *that* close to completing their overthrow of our Constitutional Republic.
Trump is the pro-America street fighter America NEEDED.
A "genteel" country club Bush-republican would have surrendered by now.
or, more likely, fake news
This is why we all have to boycott all of Hollywood. Even the actors we think we like are victims of Hollywood groupthink.
Texas Fossil wrote:
“It doesn’t.
He might have said it with sarcasm a foot thick.”
Good point!
That media outlet needs to use sarcasm tags...
The problem with all of these articles is that it is based on the same single quote about Bloomberg being “in there” which could mean being in the race to have another option for democrat voters to consider or being in the White House. These liberals writing the articles are clearly spinning it as anti-Trump, which may be the exact opposite intent by Eastwood who otherwise speaks well of Trump.
As he drives me back to my hotel, he expresses an affinity for another former mayor: "The best thing we could do is just get Mike Bloomberg in there.”
Until I hear it direct from the lips of Eastwood, I view this as fantasy on part of the writer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.