Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Republicans unveil 'realistic' climate plan focused on capturing carbon from fossil fuels
Washington Examiner ^ | February 12, 2020 12:18 PM | by Josh Siegel

Posted on 02/12/2020 1:12:53 PM PST by Hojczyk

The carbon capture package includes a bill, introduced Wednesday, for the United States to work toward a global goal of planting a trillion trees. It also features an expansion of a tax break approved by Congress in 2018 and signed by President Trump for companies that use carbon capture technology to trap carbon from fossil fuel or industrial plants. The new bill would make the so-called 45Q tax credit permanent, increasing the amount paid to companies and lowering the threshold of captured carbon to qualify for it.

Another bill looks to boost research, development, and deployment of carbon capture technology for natural gas plants.

“We have chosen to put a price on carbon, but doing it through incentives and actually doubling down on that,” said Rep. Garret Graves of Louisiana, the top Republican on the House select climate committee. He was contrasting the Republican preference for tax subsidies as opposed to a broader carbon tax that economists and many Democrats say would be needed to encourage widespread innovation away from fossil fuels.

"We've got to move forward in a fact-based, realistic approach, as opposed to something that may be more emotional," Graves said.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government
KEYWORDS: age; c; carbon; carboncapture; carboncredits; carbonmarket; ccx; climatechange; co2; garretgraves; globaltax; globalwarming; graves; ismellbs; nope; trillion
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

1 posted on 02/12/2020 1:12:53 PM PST by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
“We have chosen to put a price on carbon, but doing it through incentives and actually doubling down on that,” said Rep. Garret Graves of Louisiana ...

Noooooooo!!!

2 posted on 02/12/2020 1:14:35 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

God Save Us from “realistic” Republicans


3 posted on 02/12/2020 1:14:36 PM PST by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oldeconomybuyer

translation: Our corrupt puppetmasters on Wall Street really want this carbon credit scam to get going.


4 posted on 02/12/2020 1:15:24 PM PST by Buckeye McFrog (Patrick Henry would have been an anti-vaxxer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

What fools...so now everyone will think climate change crap is real...

Have them prove it first...GOP is hopeless...

Why not cut immigration to zero and deport all illegals..that will help the climate...

Look at all the trees we will save..


5 posted on 02/12/2020 1:16:07 PM PST by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

In my simple mind to capture the carbon in fossil fuels you burn it. Is that still true?


6 posted on 02/12/2020 1:18:21 PM PST by Rapscallion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Plants and trees still need carbon to live. No one wants to look at the Peridic Chart to see what percentage of the atmosphere is carbon. It is only .04 percent of the one percent that is left after nitrogen and oxygen is taken away.


7 posted on 02/12/2020 1:18:28 PM PST by Parmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

I have an idea, lets just save the money, give a little global warming a chance.


8 posted on 02/12/2020 1:22:56 PM PST by exnavy (american by birth and choice, I love this country!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

this stupid is sure running deep...


9 posted on 02/12/2020 1:23:10 PM PST by teeman8r (Armageddon won't be pretty, but it's not like it's the end of the world)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

There’s already more trees in the US today than there was when settlers showed up. And prairie can store more carbon underground that trees can above it. So what’s the fixation on trees really about?


10 posted on 02/12/2020 1:23:44 PM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: piasa

It’s a Goodie two shoes move for the cameras...


11 posted on 02/12/2020 1:25:49 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Baseball players, gangsters and musicians are remembered. But journalists are forgotten.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

IDIOTS!! Just reject the premise. You are falling into the ages-old “give them an inch, they’ll take a mile” trap. How GD STUPID do you have to be?


12 posted on 02/12/2020 1:29:20 PM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Idiots.


13 posted on 02/12/2020 1:31:21 PM PST by E Pluribus Bellum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Proof that being a republican doesn’t mean that you aren’t a anti-science nitwit.


14 posted on 02/12/2020 1:32:18 PM PST by hal ogen (First Amendment or Reeducation Camp???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

We’re dealing with a special form of stupid right here.


15 posted on 02/12/2020 1:32:36 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Ah, an Exxon scheme is afoot:

Integrated Carbon Capture and Storage in the Louisiana ...
https://www.lsu.edu/ces/research/projects/carbon-safe.php

Integrated Carbon Capture and Storage in the Louisiana Chemical Corridor About the Project In 2017, LSU researchers received a $1.4 million grant from the National Energy Technology Laboratory, or NETL, a part of the U.S. Department of Energy, to study the feasibility of industrial carbon capture and storage, or CCS, along the Louisiana Chemical Corridor.


16 posted on 02/12/2020 1:33:19 PM PST by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

GOP collaborators. I wonder what their cut will be and how much their political handlers have already sent them?


17 posted on 02/12/2020 1:33:30 PM PST by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Stupid waste of time

Lordy the congress is a bunch of morons


18 posted on 02/12/2020 1:33:46 PM PST by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

I’m not sure burying CO2 is such a good idea. Under ground the gas is gonna migrate to wherever the paths of least resistance take it. I would be concerned about it getting into potable water supplies.


19 posted on 02/12/2020 1:37:59 PM PST by be-baw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Stupid squared.

CO2 is not a dangerous pollutant.

It is essential for life on earth.


20 posted on 02/12/2020 1:41:14 PM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizens Are Born Here of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-40 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson