Skip to comments.
Gabbard suing Clinton for defamation over 'Russian asset' comments
The Hill ^
| 01 22 2020
| Rebecca Klar
Posted on 01/22/2020 6:13:04 AM PST by yesthatjallen
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
To: yesthatjallen
Hopefully, Gabbard has a good security team around her.
2
posted on
01/22/2020 6:15:12 AM PST
by
voicereason
(The RNC is like the "one-night stand" you wish you could forget.)
To: yesthatjallen
That could actually be a class action suit. I mean, who hasnt Hillary accused of being a Russian asset?
3
posted on
01/22/2020 6:15:13 AM PST
by
LIConFem
(I will no longer accept the things I cannot change. it's time to change the things I cannot accept.)
To: yesthatjallen
Rep. Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii) is suing Hillary Clinton for defamation over the former secretary of state's remarks on a podcast characterizing the Democratic presidential candidate as a Russian asset. You go girl. Sue the pantsuit off her.
To: yesthatjallen
Hope she sues her pant suits off.
5
posted on
01/22/2020 6:15:56 AM PST
by
period end of story
(Give me a firm spot, and I will move the world.)
To: yesthatjallen
I hope Gabbard wins big. It’s mind boggling how people on the left can just make stuff up, very damaging stuff, and not get challenged.
6
posted on
01/22/2020 6:16:34 AM PST
by
brownsfan
(Behold, the power of government cheese.)
To: voicereason
And some ceramic plates for her vest.
7
posted on
01/22/2020 6:17:42 AM PST
by
rktman
( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: yesthatjallen
Hillary: I didn't say she was a Russian asset.
I said she has a nice ass!
8
posted on
01/22/2020 6:18:00 AM PST
by
real saxophonist
(Everything I Play Gone Be Funky, From Now On)
To: Jess Kitting
Yewwwwwww! NOHOTOS! 😵
9
posted on
01/22/2020 6:18:35 AM PST
by
rktman
( #My2ndAmend! ----- Enlisted in the Navy in '67 to protect folks rights to strip my rights. WTH?)
To: yesthatjallen
Look at me! Look at me! Nuisance lawsuit given that Rep. Gabbard is a public figure.
If smearing a public figure’s reputation is suit-worthy, the list of plaintiffs against Trump would be 30 blocks long.
10
posted on
01/22/2020 6:19:26 AM PST
by
OrangeHoof
(The Democrats - Unafraid to burn in Hell.)
To: yesthatjallen
Nothing! Its a publicity thing, it will be a quick out of court settlement. Hoping for Hillary’s 127M is fantasy. Hillary will apologize (sincerely of course) and the feud will end. That’s my take.
11
posted on
01/22/2020 6:19:26 AM PST
by
Bringbackthedraft
( #ReasonableDemocratsforTrump. Where are you?)
To: period end of story
hell no, the stench would ruin the atmosphere...
12
posted on
01/22/2020 6:22:20 AM PST
by
heavy metal
(truth trumps lies...)
To: Bringbackthedraft
Smart move on TGs part. Everyone hates Hillary.
13
posted on
01/22/2020 6:23:21 AM PST
by
cnsmom
To: Bringbackthedraft
You are probably right but HRC issuing a real apology seems unlikely so there is that.
To: Bringbackthedraft
——Thats my take.-—
I will not disagree but raise the possibility that there enough Democrats who believe that Hillary is a worn out nuscence detrimental to the party that will take positions that will prevent the apology and settlement.
There is an opportunity to get rid of her ....... take it
15
posted on
01/22/2020 6:25:48 AM PST
by
bert
( (KE. NP. N.C. +12) Progressives are existential American enemies)
To: OrangeHoof
Not so sure. The standard is knowing falsehood or reckless disregard for the truth. Maybe, just maybe. Perhaps at the very least this could be a case that results in SCOTUS reversing that abomination, New York Times v Sullivan. Getting rid of Sullivan would go a long way in restoring sanity in the media
16
posted on
01/22/2020 6:27:49 AM PST
by
j.havenfarm
( Beginning my 20th year on FR! 2,500+ replies and still not shutting up!)
To: yesthatjallen
17
posted on
01/22/2020 6:29:31 AM PST
by
yldstrk
(Bingo! We have a winner!)
To: OrangeHoof
Exactly. She is a public figure. Unfortunately, her lawsuit is stupid.
18
posted on
01/22/2020 6:29:35 AM PST
by
DivineMomentsOfTruth
("There is but one straight course, and that is to seek truth and pursue it steadily." -GW)
To: yesthatjallen
This stunt goes nowhere.
Hillary will say she didn’t mean that Tulsi was a Russian asset in the sense of being a controlled operative; rather, she was an unwitting tool on the “plus” side of the Russian agitation ledger. If it gets that far, which it won’t.
To: DivineMomentsOfTruth
It is worth it to show that damn Hillary that everyone is over her. Hillary is a has been.
20
posted on
01/22/2020 6:31:41 AM PST
by
yldstrk
(Bingo! We have a winner!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-63 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson