Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Education Choice Could Shift the Black Vote
Townhall.com ^ | January 22, 2020 | Star Parker

Posted on 01/22/2020 4:04:59 AM PST by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last
To: Eleutheria5

>
Giving the parents say over where their kids go to school is the first step towards some sort of accountability for the educational bureaucracy
>

And the economic slaves paying taxes w/o usage/benefit??

>
If a two-house majority and state legislative majorities can bring about school choice, the Dems will not be able to scream “racism” loud enough to dissuade minorities from voting Republican. Trump can make it happen.
>

& if frogs had wings, they wouldn’t bump their asses when they hopped.

I don’t recall ANY State re-affirming their 9th/10th A. authority, let alone the feckless (R)-wing of the Uniparty (when’s the last time A1S8 was uttered by EITHER chamber of Congress??).

The (R)N(C) hasn’t done *poop* about it in 40yrs+ (GROWN it, actually), there’s NO way the President has *any* authority over the matter.


21 posted on 01/22/2020 10:25:33 AM PST by i_robot73 (One could not count the number of *solutions*, if only govt followed\enforced the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: i_robot73

And the economic slaves paying taxes w/o usage/benefit??

>
The parents ARE the economic slaves. Even if they rent, they are paying the taxes their landlord pays because he charges his tenants the cost. As for income tax, which goes towards, inter alia, welfare checks and subsidizing public schools, it’s a huge benefit that the children get to go to a school that actually teaches something, because then, instead of another generation of welfare dependents and/or criminals, the better schools will yield a crop of employable adults, and the failed public schools will have to lay off or fire ineffective teachers and administrators due to the fall-off in income. Win-win.

& if frogs had wings, they wouldn’t bump their asses when they hopped...blah blah blah.

OK. We’re all doomed. Surrender. Good luck.


22 posted on 01/22/2020 10:38:33 AM PST by Eleutheria5 ("SHUT UP!" he explained.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
The black vote isn’t coming.

The white vote will save Trump, or sink him.

The black vote can sink the Democrats without even voting. Because the Democrats need the black vote, and if it doesn’t turn out, Trump wins.

23 posted on 01/22/2020 12:46:22 PM PST by conservatism_IS_compassion (Socialism is cynicism directed towards society and - correspondingly - naivete towards government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

>
As for income tax, which goes towards, inter alia, welfare checks and subsidizing public schools, it’s a huge benefit that the children get to go to a school that actually teaches something, because then, instead of another generation of welfare dependents and/or criminals, the better schools will yield a crop of employable adults, and the failed public schools will have to lay off or fire ineffective teachers and administrators due to the fall-off in income. Win-win
>

Wait? Schools ‘teach’ something? That alone validates the (economic) enslavement\Rights trampling of others??

Lastly, WHEN was the last time a govt school was CLOSED? 10-15 yrs after (while any private/charter is done IMMEDIATELY)? Let alone the time/cost/trouble to FIRE bad teachers+

Govt uses taxpayers to subsidize its failures

>
>>
& if frogs had wings, they wouldn’t bump their asses when they hopped...blah blah blah.
>>
OK. We’re all doomed. Surrender. Good luck.
>

Unless you can point to any elected poli critter articulating anything counter to the accepted ‘truth’....Or are you of the ‘cont. to pull the same party lever, expecting diff. results’ crowd?


24 posted on 01/29/2020 5:26:08 AM PST by i_robot73 (One could not count the number of *solutions*, if only govt followed\enforced the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: i_robot73

Wait? Schools ‘teach’ something? That alone validates the (economic) enslavement\Rights trampling of others??

You keep pretending that there is a difference between tax payers and tax beneficiaries. The question is, how to arrange the benefits and the taxes so that they work to create the result desired, more productive taxpayers. Under the present system, they do not. The economic enslavement and rights trampling goes on, producing illiterate burdens. Producing functioning citizens means producing people able to produce and provide for themselves, and share the burdens of citizenship, thereby relieving the “others”. They become taxpayers, rather than remaining burdens.

“Lastly, WHEN was the last time a govt school was CLOSED? 10-15 yrs after (while any private/charter is done IMMEDIATELY)? Let alone the time/cost/trouble to FIRE bad teachers+

Govt uses taxpayers to subsidize its failures”

So therefore the thing to do is continue to produce failure and continue to subsidize it. Take the money away and the school will either shape up to attract the money back, or ultimately close down.

“Unless you can point to any elected poli critter articulating anything counter to the accepted ‘truth’....Or are you of the ‘cont. to pull the same party lever, expecting diff. results’ crowd?”

Try coherence. This is unreadable.


25 posted on 01/29/2020 7:11:08 AM PST by Eleutheria5 ("SHUT UP!" he explained.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5
> You keep pretending that there is a difference between tax payers and tax beneficiaries. > Yeah, it's pretty easy actually. Payers == $$ OUT, beneficiaries == $$ IN > The question is, how to arrange the benefits and the taxes so that they work to create the result desired, more productive taxpayers. > Productive? How so? TO whom? Our Republic doesn't exist to ensure govt is a positive cash flow entity, let alone centrally-planned social engineer for some "utopia". > Producing functioning citizens means producing people able to produce and provide for themselves, and share the burdens of citizenship, thereby relieving the “others”. They become taxpayers, rather than remaining burdens. > Burdens of citizenship? Pray tell, what are those? Piggy-bank for 'benefits' to others? Easy way to remove the 'burdens': terminate the illegal welfare state in all it's many shapes/matter/forms/types & shrink govt back to its rightful size. > So therefore the thing to do is continue to produce failure and continue to subsidize it. Take the money away and the school will either shape up to attract the money back, or ultimately close down. > "Try coherence. This is unreadable.". Glass houses, FRiend. Govt doesn't SOLVE issue(s)\problem(s); esp. not by denying its own power grabs via 'take the $ away'. @ least not w/o YEARS to push-back & further $$ flushed down the tubes. X closing down from lack of funds for its failure @ [A|B|C..] only happens in the REAL world, not govt.
26 posted on 01/29/2020 10:23:39 AM PST by i_robot73 (One could not count the number of *solutions*, if only govt followed\enforced the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: i_robot73

Do you believe that Trump is going to abolish the Income Tax and defund everything except the post office and military? Dream on.

School choice is what you do when education is going to be funded no matter what, in order to make the funding smarter and more effective, and throw a wrench in the machinery of multi-generational dependency.

That goes: Payers==$$ Out for “education”, $$ Out for welfare moms, $$ Out for prisons, $$ Out for fake rehab programs, $$ Out for more welfare moms, $$ Out for more “education,” and $$ Out for more prisons. Repeat until society collapses.

School choice isn’t extra money out, it’s allocating the money that’s already going out in a way that might end this vicious cycle. I say might. But you say, if it costs money, blahblahblah it costs money. I have yet to hear a constructive alternative from you. You’re opposed to public education. I’m opposed to keeping it as it is.

So are a great many minority voters who have been victimized themselves—not by “white supremacy” or any of those other fake bugaboos, but by the public non-education system, and the welfare state that it’s designed to perpetuate. I agree with them. You disagree with everyone.

If I’m wrong, give me a real alternative that is right.


27 posted on 01/29/2020 10:35:13 AM PST by Eleutheria5 ("SHUT UP!" he explained.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Eleutheria5

>
School choice is what you do when education is going to be funded no matter what, in order to make the funding smarter and more effective, and throw a wrench in the machinery of multi-generational dependency.
>

Ye got plenty of ‘school choice’...not much of a ‘wrench’ so far.

>
I have yet to hear a constructive alternative from you. You’re opposed to public education. I’m opposed to keeping it as it is.
>

Please. You can search & see positive, constructive and (only/wholly) *legal* “alternatives”
- Elim property taxes (restore prop. Rights)
- Elim welfare state (restore GOBS of Rights)
- Return to user pays upon service(s) rendered

NOBODY cares more about the cost, quality & efficiency than the one writing the check.

‘Vouchers’ merely shift from govt being the 3rd party payer to parent(s)\guardian(s) telling govt where to the send the TAXPAYER supplied check + a bit of their own $$.

Better education? Cheaper? Seems...until govt can put down the jack-boot (and they ARE a trying...& winning).

But, of “course”, you’re right. You say so yourself *rolls eyes*


28 posted on 02/04/2020 8:41:20 AM PST by i_robot73 (One could not count the number of *solutions*, if only govt followed\enforced the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

True, school choice would benefit inner city Blacks the most, and it is a Republican initiative. This should be a major reason for Blacks to support Trump imho.


29 posted on 02/04/2020 8:44:42 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: i_robot73

Two things-
1) Most state constitutions require the state to provide education to the children of that state.
2). My friend who is a teacher said one time when we were talking about every parent paying for education that half the kids in his district would never set foot in a school then.


30 posted on 02/04/2020 8:45:06 AM PST by OIFVeteran
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: i_robot73

Nice conversation you’re having with your navel. I wish you luck in convincing it that you’re right. If you would at least explain to the rest of us what you mean, we could evaluate and respond.


31 posted on 02/04/2020 11:53:30 AM PST by Eleutheria5 ("SHUT UP!" he explained.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-31 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson