Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Nancy Pelosi names Nadler, Schiff as managers for Trump’s Senate trial
NY Post ^ | January 15, 2020 | Mark Moore

Posted on 01/15/2020 7:36:42 AM PST by COUNTrecount

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-174 next last
To: COUNTrecount

Does appointing them managers keep them from being called as witnesses?

That sounds like the type of ‘strategy’ they would employ.

Recall that Schiff claimed to have ‘evidence’ of foul play, but never produced it in the House.


101 posted on 01/15/2020 8:17:05 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: centurion316

Only trolls like eeyore 90 constantly attack our own and cause discord.


102 posted on 01/15/2020 8:18:23 AM PST by DarthVader (Not by speeches & majority decisions will the great issues of the daitbe decided but by Blood & Iron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount
Pelosi’s announcement comes just hours before the House will vote on releasing the two articles of impeachment... to Senate so a trial can get underway.

There has never before been a vote to release the articles of impeachment after the vote to approve the articles of impeachment.

This smells of CYA for Pelosi for delaying it in the first place. Now she will say it wasn't her decision, she had to wait for a vote to send it to the Senate.

-PJ

103 posted on 01/15/2020 8:19:35 AM PST by Political Junkie Too (Freedom of the press is the People's right to publish, not CNN's right to the 1st question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EQAndyBuzz

I am not a lwayer so I could be missing something here, but...

In a normal court setting, it would probably be considered foul to call the prosecutor or defense attorney as a witness, but its also an ethical problem to represent someone if you have a self interest in the case.

Now, if the lawyer for any one side looks like he might be a material witness for his side, he has a choice to step aside in favor of another attorney so he can then be called as a witness to support his (previous) client.

Thats not the same as addressing a dirty prosecutor so I am not sure how it would be handled, but the defense could always point out the conflict of interest and see if they can have the prosecutor replaced.

None of this is in a real legal setting though. Its a political setting and exercise. The rules are what the Senate makes them to be.


104 posted on 01/15/2020 8:21:06 AM PST by Magnum44 (My comprehensive terrorism plan: Hunt them down and kill them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: RatRipper

I’m thinking not. The Senators are jurors. With Clinton they all gave speeches at the end but, beyond that they lousy listen


105 posted on 01/15/2020 8:21:34 AM PST by j.havenfarm ( Beginning my 20th year on FR! 2,500+ replies and still not shutting up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

A Rogues Gallery.


106 posted on 01/15/2020 8:23:31 AM PST by Amish with an attitude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader

See post 89...and see reality.

It’s not rocket science!


107 posted on 01/15/2020 8:24:30 AM PST by newfreep ("INSIDE EVERY PROGRESSIVE IS A TOTALITARIAN SCREAMING TO GET OUT" - DAVID HOROWITZ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: philetus

108 posted on 01/15/2020 8:24:36 AM PST by COUNTrecount ("I've always won, and I'm going to continue to win. And that's the way it is." -- Donald Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Will Nadler stay awake??


109 posted on 01/15/2020 8:25:44 AM PST by TMA62 (Al Sharpton - The North Korea of race relations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: newfreep

Lol. I see it and know of reality too that you all don’t process.


110 posted on 01/15/2020 8:26:22 AM PST by DarthVader (Not by speeches & majority decisions will the great issues of the daitbe decided but by Blood & Iron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

“The House managers are expected to personally deliver the articles to the Senate later Wednesday.”

Mitch should advise them to leave the worthless documents in his mailbox...he has more judges to confirm.


111 posted on 01/15/2020 8:26:28 AM PST by EODGUY (God's Will...nothing more....nothing less.....nothing else!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DarthVader

Miss Lindsey Graham, is that you?

Good grief...


112 posted on 01/15/2020 8:27:18 AM PST by newfreep ("INSIDE EVERY PROGRESSIVE IS A TOTALITARIAN SCREAMING TO GET OUT" - DAVID HOROWITZ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Why am I not surprised? I see lots of funny skits on Greg Gutfield show coming up.


113 posted on 01/15/2020 8:27:34 AM PST by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll Onward! Ride to the sound of the guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Why am I not surprised? I see lots of funny skits on Greg Gutfield show coming up.


114 posted on 01/15/2020 8:27:34 AM PST by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll Onward! Ride to the sound of the guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Williams

Why am I not surprised? I see lots of funny skits on Greg Gutfield show coming up.


115 posted on 01/15/2020 8:27:34 AM PST by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll Onward! Ride to the sound of the guns!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Mitch should tell the House that there will be no pomp and circumstance in delivery of the document/notification. Then have some secretary take possession of it from the group of idiots.


116 posted on 01/15/2020 8:28:16 AM PST by voicereason (The RNC is like the "one-night stand" you wish you could forget.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FranklinsTower

I agree. Can a house manager be called as a witness and made to testify under oath?


117 posted on 01/15/2020 8:28:20 AM PST by EODGUY (God's Will...nothing more....nothing less.....nothing else!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: newfreep

No FF. Just someone who swore an oath and who will fulfill it.


118 posted on 01/15/2020 8:28:35 AM PST by DarthVader (Not by speeches & majority decisions will the great issues of the daitbe decided but by Blood & Iron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: COUNTrecount

Snow (cocaine) White (Privileged) Nancy and the Seven Dwarfs.


119 posted on 01/15/2020 8:29:29 AM PST by Scott from the Left Coast (It's the corruption, stupid)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EODGUY

The House managers can be rejected and for good reason.


120 posted on 01/15/2020 8:30:00 AM PST by DarthVader (Not by speeches & majority decisions will the great issues of the daitbe decided but by Blood & Iron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-174 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson