There is giant fraud in what the sheeple like Greta say, a fraud they have been taught to promote, even though it is counter to the scientific opinion that says human made CO2 is the problem.
That scientific opinion and its models rely on an attribute assigned by the models to CO2, the attribute of how long the models say CO2 remains in the atmosphere once it is put there.
Without the value they assign to that attribute the theory falls apart. So to accept the theory requires accepting what the models say about the “atmospheric shelf life” of CO2 in the atmosphere. The time frame assigned by the models to that CO2 shelf life is very long, extremely long in fact.
It is so long, that if you were to speak in accordance with the models own science, you’d know that telling people to change how they are now producing CO2 will change little now about “climate” or weather. Why? Massive adjustments in production of CO2 will not even start to reduce the growth of atmospheric CO2 for anywhere from 100 to 2000 years or more from now, because of how long CO2 already in the atmosphere will remain there together with CO2 added by natural causes.
But Greta’s assignment is not to tell that truth.
For if the models are wrong, then those behind Greta know they have her asking people to embark on a fools errand.
If the man-made global warming theorists are correct, then the best use of human capital, science and engineering for the best investment for the future is in developing methods and means to adapt to and mitigate the effects of “climate change”. It will cost far less than chasing CO2 and provide what society really needs if the climate modelers theories are correct, while harming us little if they are wrong.
Well said.