Posted on 12/26/2019 9:03:05 AM PST by taildragger
Talking about pardons, fixing the so-called homeless problem, Trump takes on California, Israel and coffee https://t.co/K3EW0rOzJE— Scott Adams (@ScottAdamsSays) December 26, 2019
At 20 mins through about about 25ish (Even before talking about CA's problems), @ 21:50 "I think he's might be taking a run for it".
Trump will win CA when pigs can fly.
Every vote matters. Even if you don’t win the State.
IMHO this is a B@!!sy move, I can see PDJT doing it.
Freepers please opine after listening....
I got that a lot with Scott Brown vs Martha Coakley, when I posted I really thought he had a shot @ winning it...
> Trump will win CA when pigs can fly. <
Yep. And multiple pigs would have to fly on multiple days. Hillary beat Trump in CA by over 30 points. So a squeaker it was not.
No. Nor unless SF and LA magically fall in the ocean. Not worth campaigning there.
No Republican is going to win CA in our lifetime.
“Every vote matters. Even if you don’t win the State.”
that’s very true, especially necessary to retake the House, plus should Trump “win” the so-called “popular vote”, it’ll totally take the wind out of the sails of the lunatic left regarding elimination of the Electoral College ...
Perhaps that was because more Cali Trump supporters didn't even bother to vote. I think it's important for Trump to win the Popular Vote, because it does give him more leverage.
Waste of time. Scott can’t see his past his CA narcissism filter.
Ancient Vulcan proverb: “Only Trump could go to California.”
“Every vote matters. Even if you don’t win the State.”
Not according to our Constitution. It’s winner take all.
Every vote matters in Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Michigan and Florida.
Not in California.
All things considered, I’d rather see Trump try to nail down Colorado, New Mexico and Nevada.
If the campaign put a lot of effort into California and lost it only 53-47%, there’s a problem. We still lost it and expended a lot of money and effort doing so.
California, Oregon and Washington look like lost causes - especially Cali. The only states west of the Mississippi that strike me as winnable are Nevada, New Mexico and Colorado.
Why not try? Ask for their vote? I thin New York could be in play also.
Take the voter fraud out of CA and DJT does have a chance in CA. California is the RAT’s prototype for voter fraud. If you doubt that, do a search on California’s Voter Fraud.
https://californiaglobe.com/legislature/dmv-enables-massive-voter-fraud-in-the-golden-state/
https://fox40.com/2018/10/10/california-dmv-blunders-exacerbate-voter-fraud-concerns/
Shall we discuss how Hitlery did NOT win the popular vote in 2016 and the RATs did NOT win the House in 2018? It was Voter Fraud!
“Why not try?”
Opportunity cost. He has a clear path to 2020 if he repeats his winning formula. Better is the enemy of good.
Wasn't that the axiom of a former CA Democrat?
Some guy, I don't know,.. Ronald-something-or-other... ;-)
I have always advocated individuals who run for Team Constitution in EVERY elective office possible, no matter the actual likelihood of winning. The overall point of such an effort is that we will not be stymied. This means running constitutionalists in Nancy Pelosi’s district, Maxine Waters district, and every damn district in the state.
When one can look at running a race at being part of a team of like-minded, small government individuals of all professions, age ranges, skin color, and religious components, it will help break the narrative.
OBVIOUSLY we are not going to win California in 2020. Worse yet, the demographic trend is going more and more to non-native Americans. But this is what PRECISELY needed.
Main example: In Britain, one of the biggest reasons for the conservative landslide in Parliament was the clarion call made by Nigel Farage putting together a massive coalition of candidates to run in ANY district, then using this leverage against Boris Johnson and the Tories (conservatives) to get them to commit to Brexit, then he stood down candidates in Tory districts, while ensuring that the Lib Dems and Labour were occupied with expending their limited resources in those races and not in swing districts with Tories.
In short, Nigel Farage has provided the blueprint that will leverage Trump’s unique personality and effectiveness. Bottom line: Even if you run in Maxine’s or Nancy’s district and lose 85% to 15%, that is 15% MORE people in each district that has been reached, and can be red-pilled. It’s not a guarantee, and still a longshot to be honest, but cumulatively this is how California can be brought back from the brink over the next decade.
(Personally, and pragmatically I don’t see it happening, but the effort must be made. Anything else is submission to the global slavery movement.)
Not a chance. Concentrate on holding Pennsylvania, Arizona, Iowa, Michigan, and Wisconsin
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.