Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 12/20/2019 5:39:00 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Estimates for transportation on (always corrupt) liberal cities ALWAYS forecast profits.

Oh, and the earth is heating, too.


26 posted on 12/20/2019 6:09:18 PM PST by Da Coyote (is)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Sounds like Amtrak; a world class boondoggle.


28 posted on 12/20/2019 6:15:58 PM PST by Jack Hammer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Until the BIG MONEY is fighting to invest in it, more than likely a losing proposition.

Same as stadiums....if all that profitable the Trumps and Bloombergs and Gates etal would be fighting each other to build them AND reap the profits the cities say they will make.

At least with Amazon building in New York or Arlington VA, the local government will get a huge chunk of their ‘investment’ back from the property and wage taxes, plus all spent in the neighborhoods and housing etc.


29 posted on 12/20/2019 6:16:51 PM PST by xrmusn (6/98"HRC is the Grandmother that lures Hansel & Gretel to the pot")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Estimate more like $100 Billion.


30 posted on 12/20/2019 6:17:24 PM PST by Captain Peter Blood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Peddling light rail to corrupt local politicians worked. This is the guaranteed more-of-the-same.


34 posted on 12/20/2019 6:29:37 PM PST by coaster123 (Those 40 or younger will meet horror before they meet death.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

This is what they always say.

Not one of the projects pays for itself. NOT ONE!

Further, they’ll project an overall project cost of 10-20% on the dollar.

You won’t find out what you’re really paying for it for decades.

Don’t worry, you can always steal gas tax dollars to help pay for it, then create toll booths to make the middle-class suckers pay for it all over again.


39 posted on 12/20/2019 6:42:18 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Pledge: "...and to the Democracy for which it stands..." I give up. Use the democRat meme...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

LMAO!


41 posted on 12/20/2019 6:46:20 PM PST by indthkr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Since rush hour is different in CA, we could have CA loan their fantastic high sppeed rail to the Rust Belt while CA is still asleep. People in CA will never know its gone.


45 posted on 12/20/2019 7:26:39 PM PST by spintreebob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

What could possibly go wrong? Ask California.


47 posted on 12/20/2019 7:29:08 PM PST by Captain Compassion (I'm just sayin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

you know what , if they’re going to build this thing with private financing I say more power to them. It either works or fails depending on what the public wants. But I don’t want any of my tax money spent on this thing.


49 posted on 12/20/2019 7:43:48 PM PST by technically right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

That’s “Highly profitable?” I think not.


50 posted on 12/20/2019 7:55:18 PM PST by gogeo (The left prides themselves on being tolerant, but they can't even be civil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

$40 billion, huh ? Betcha it would cost closer to $500-750 billion by the time the real costs figured in (payoffs to the usual suspects).


51 posted on 12/20/2019 8:23:55 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (Dear Mr. Kotter, #Epsteindidntkillhimself - Signed, Epstein's Mother)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks
This is only OK is Federal, state, and local governments not fund one cent or guarantee anything. Either Taggart Transcontinental or nothing. The Feds can't afford subsidizing it, nor the states along the path, particularly Illinois and New York.
53 posted on 12/20/2019 8:34:06 PM PST by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Here’s a little bit of reality. Rail time between Chicago and Cleveland is about 7 hours. Freight schedules are 3-7 DAYS, due to loading, switching, scheduling, and unloading. It sound like cutting the transit time by 80% won’t actually cut the freight shipping time by much.


57 posted on 12/20/2019 9:54:34 PM PST by VanShuyten ("...that all the donkeys were dead. I know nothing as to the fate of the less valuable animals.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Great, if it’s supposed to be so highly profitable they won’t need one red cent of taxpayer money......right? I’ll believe this fairy tale when the project is 100% privately funded with a contract requirement prohibits and city/state/federal funding.


58 posted on 12/20/2019 10:29:23 PM PST by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Why is air travel popular and profitable.

The equipment is not limited in the path it can travel.

The most efficient travel does not have very much path restriction on the equipment. It can go this way or that.

The least efficient passenger ground transporation is trains or anything like them that must travel a dedicated path.

The most efficient is the road-highway system that has the least path restrictions, so a route may use any number of alternate paths from point A to point B, and thus where stops can be made or can be avoided as unnecessary may be chosen, as well as selecting for all sorts of variables.

The one advantage trains have over trucks is the total heavy payload possibilities, for freight, on very long haul routes. That was total tonnage, not speed, is the advantage.

I have not seen the rationale for how hyperloop systems change the transportation equations. I think the backers simply avoid what is already known about the limitations of fixed-path ground (or underground) transport. For passenger travel they require sufficient population density living along the fixed path and with demand within that population for going along that path. That has so far only been present in the U.S. on the Northeast Corridor path between Boston, through New York, Phildelphia, Baltimore to Washington D.C. It is maybe the one profitable long distance passenger train corridor in the U.S.

The Pittsburgh-Cleveland-Chicago population (and population density) is many times smaller than that on the Northeast corrider, and yet the hyperloop promoters expect a form of transport likely to be more expensive than that on the Northeast corrider today is going to be financially supported by the demands of the Pittsburg-Cleveland-Chicago population. I seriously doubt it.

The flying car is likely to be in use before hyperloop trains come up from underground.


61 posted on 12/21/2019 8:31:56 AM PST by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson