Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

In London, Trump Won With Misdirection
Townhall.com ^ | December 6, 2019 | Nicholas Waddy

Posted on 12/06/2019 6:29:45 AM PST by Kaslin

President Trump is an able politician, but he is seldom praised for his subtlety. At the NATO summit in London, however, he carried the day by precisely those means: he used rhetorical legerdemain to outmaneuver his critics.

Much as the media might like to pretend that the recently concluded NATO summit was about NATO when it wasn't. NATO is a sideshow. It is a moribund, rudderless organization — “brain dead” or “obsolete,” depending on whether you want to take your cue from the president of France or the USA.

NATO was formed to contain the aggression of a certain nameless communist superpower that no longer exists, except in the diseased imaginations of inveterate Russophobes and Russophobic charlatans. NATO today is but a glorified debating society, and the topic of debate is always the same: what is NATO? And does anyone still care?

This week's summit wasn't, therefore, about NATO at all. It was about the upcoming British election, on which the future of Britain so obviously hinges, and quite possibly the future of the United States and Europe as well.

Boris Johnson, the sly, impish sitting Prime Minister, is a conservative, a Brexiteer, and a rare friendly face in Europe for Trumpers. The average of the polls predicting the outcome of the December 12th general election in the U.K. suggests that Johnson's Tories will triumph by around 10 points. That's more than enough to build a solid conservative majority that will both carry Johnson's revised E.U, withdrawal agreement over the finish line, and guarantee the continuation of Tory rule for another five years, or more. This means, at a minimum, that a Trump ally will imminently win re-election, despite his personal unpopularity among U.K. voters, providing Trump with diplomatic cover and a useful road map for how a brash, populist conservative can prevail against the headwinds of elite and media disdain. That's all to the good.

Johnson's impending victory, however, could portend much more than this. It could also set the stage for a much-ballyhooed free trade agreement between Britain and the United States. If it came soon enough, and perhaps in combination with a resolution to the U.S.-China trade war, that trade agreement could give Trump's re-election bid a significant shot in the arm. Even if the agreement is still in the planning stages, though, it will prove that Trump's America has powerful friends abroad. Indeed, it could mean that the “special relationship” between Britain and the U.S. becomes, under Trump, stronger than ever.

The upside for Johnson and Trump doesn't end there, however. Boris Johnson's primary argument to voters in the general election is that, having voted for Brexit, and having watched their political elite procrastinate for three long years, Britains now simply want to get Brexit done. Johnson's revised withdrawal agreement gives the U.K. the chance to do exactly that. Every conservative candidate has promised to vote for the agreement, moreover, meaning a conservative victory guarantees Brexit. Given the polls, therefore, the chances of the British political establishment weaseling out of Brexit have never been lower. The chances of Brexit coming to pass have never been greater.

And Brexit may be just the beginning. Once one major E.U. member makes its exit, and once the consequences (almost inevitably) prove less damaging than the Remainer catastrophists have long suggested, other E.U. states may seriously contemplate leaving the group. If the British economy booms, aided by stronger trade ties with the U.S., the termination of E.U. bureaucratic mismanagement, or by the lifting of the veil of uncertainty that has vexed the British economy for three long years, then the chances of an E.U. crackup increase exponentially.

Should that happen, the long-discussed possibility of the formation of an alternative locus of western power, perhaps based in France and/or Germany, and potentially able to displace the United States as the leading force in Western Civilization, would come to nothing. The E.U.'s pretensions to sovereignty and to superpower status would evaporate, leaving the U.S. and, to a lesser extent, Britain in a dominant position in the western world. France and Germany would be left with fine wine and Lederhosen, respectively, and a great deal of hurt pride, but very little else. Trump and Johnson would be veritable masters of the universe.

All these magnificent possibilities are just one week away from becoming probabilities. The only thing that remains is to translate Boris Johnson's strength in the polls into a convincing victory on election day.

And that, no matter what anyone else may say, was Trump's main, and arguably even his sole objective in London: first, do no harm to the British version of Trump. In other words, Trump had to be careful not to upset Johnson's momentum by seeming to intervene in the British election campaign. Johnson's main opponent, Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn, is woefully unfit to be prime minister, even in the eyes of many Labourites, luckily. Only a broadside from Trump, who is widely despised internationally and in Britain, could have given Corbyn the shot in the arm he so desperately needs. Trump, instead, gave Corbyn, and the election itself, a wide berth. That was exceedingly wise.

In fact, Trump did better than that. Knowing that “good behavior” would have been suspicious in diplomacy's bad boy, during the summit Trump let several fellow NATO leaders have it: Macron and Trudeau, to be precise. They must have wished that they were running for re-election next week! Serving as Trump's momentary whipping boy is perhaps the closest to “greatness” that either man will ever come. But, alas, it was Corbyn who needed to attract Trump's ire, and he did not. Alternatively, Trump might have embraced Johnson too warmly, and from that Corbyn also could have made hay, but that too never happened.

The outcome of the NATO summit, therefore, was straightforward: it left NATO twisting in the wind, as usual, but it also left Boris Johnson and the Conservatives on a clear, even irresistible, path to electoral victory and even long-term political supremacy in the United Kingdom. For once, Trump and Johnson, to secure victory, had only to do nothing — and, somewhat against their natures, they managed it.

Britain, the United States, and Europe may never be the same.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: borisjohnson; europe; nato; summit; trumpnato

1 posted on 12/06/2019 6:29:45 AM PST by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Our man is brilliant!


2 posted on 12/06/2019 6:36:44 AM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
This means, at a minimum, that a Trump ally will imminently win re-election, despite his personal unpopularity among U.K. voters, providing Trump with diplomatic cover and a useful road map for how a brash, populist conservative can prevail against the headwinds of elite and media disdain. That's all to the good.

DAFUQ did I just read? Trump demonstrated for Johnson how to prevail.

Is this guy a reluctantly-converted bowtie conservative or something?

3 posted on 12/06/2019 6:42:38 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Since when does France have a say in NATO? Didn’t they withdraw something like 50 years ago?


4 posted on 12/06/2019 6:43:31 AM PST by Vigilanteman (The politicized state destroys aspects of civil society, human kindness and private charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The Art of the Deal.

They still don't get it.

5 posted on 12/06/2019 6:45:39 AM PST by FatherofFive (Islam is EVIL and needs to be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10
Yes, President Trump is brilliant!

What his adversaries and critics lack the wit to understand is that he TOWERS over them--intellectually and morally.

6 posted on 12/06/2019 6:47:54 AM PST by Savage Beast ( The curse of intelligence: having to watch the morons try everything that obviously won't work.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: madison10

GEOTUS again plays the long game. Those who say he can’t keep his mouth shut ought to read this. You have to wonder how many other times this sort of subtle move has occurred.


7 posted on 12/06/2019 6:48:30 AM PST by numberonepal (WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
President Trump is an able politician, but he is seldom praised for his subtlety.

I think real business men and women, real deal makers, see the genius here. President Trump puts on a loud, even crass show. But like a magician, it is all misdirection. While the MSM and opponents are salivating over what perceived obnoxious sound bite he's going to put forth next...he is really subtly guiding the whole conversation. They follow where he leads.

8 posted on 12/06/2019 6:48:55 AM PST by ThunderSleeps ( Be ready!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ThunderSleeps

Scott Adams (Dilbert) always does a great job of describing what a masterful persuader President Trump is. It is like a magic act. Lots of bluster and misdirection, and in the end everything seems to work out just the way he wants it. He is amazing.


9 posted on 12/06/2019 6:54:13 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (If White Privilege is real, why did Elizabeth Warren lie about being an Indian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

Since when does France have a say in NATO?

.........
Lol.
Since American intelligence confirmed that Russia meddled in election2016 in Trump’s favor.


10 posted on 12/06/2019 6:54:24 AM PST by granada
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
Since when does France have a say in NATO? Didn’t they withdraw something like 50 years ago?

They did, then re-joined in 2009


11 posted on 12/06/2019 7:01:03 AM PST by canuck_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ThunderSleeps

The laser pointer and cats had a good time.


12 posted on 12/06/2019 7:01:27 AM PST by xp38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

BTTT for later.


13 posted on 12/06/2019 7:11:23 AM PST by Extremely Extreme Extremist (20 FReepin' years of Freakin' FReeping!!! FReep yeah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Excellent perspective and IMO, accurate.

Trump is a genius! Not only that, Trump is a POLITICAL genius!

THE GREATEST PRESIDENT EVER!!!!

Landslide 2020 coming up.


14 posted on 12/06/2019 7:19:10 AM PST by faucetman (Just the facts, ma'am, Just the facts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I hope Trump realizes full well that the world’s govt’s are chock full of backstabbing Nancy Pelosi’s and Adam Schiff’s and therefore never trusts any of them.


15 posted on 12/06/2019 7:50:47 AM PST by Bullish (My tagline ran off with another man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

No, Boris is the real deal, but the UK isn’t the USA.

There are far, far further along to deep state and elitist hegemony.

Boris has to contend with different factions within his party. He is crushing the Brit Leftists, but after the election and Brexit, he really has to work on freedom of expression and against the political correctness that enthralls the UK. And Muslims not integrating.


16 posted on 12/06/2019 8:01:35 AM PST by Alas Babylon! (The prisons do not fill themselves. Get moving, Barr!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman

“Since when does France have a say in NATO? Didn’t they withdraw something like 50 years ago?”


NATO is mostly a treaty that assures successful economic cooperation between it’s member states by maintaining a strong military alliance to safeguard against the Soviet Union. You can’t really have one without the other. That’s what Trump has been pointing out... Since the collapse of the Soviet Union, the European members have been reaping the benefits of economic success while at the same time shirking on their financial obligations to the military commitment.

France was benefiting economically while shirking responsibilities to fund the military component... I’m guessing... I’m sure it was more complex than that. After all, France does have a carrier or two, modern equipment, etc. Who knows?


17 posted on 12/06/2019 9:20:30 AM PST by Home-of-the-lazy-dog ("Leftists will stand before you and cut off their own head just to prove that they'll do it!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: canuck_conservative

News to me, but just like the French. Once it transforms into an organization with economic rewards and no military costs, then free riding becomes attractive.


18 posted on 12/06/2019 10:24:59 AM PST by Vigilanteman (The politicized state destroys aspects of civil society, human kindness and private charity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

BTTT


19 posted on 12/06/2019 10:25:49 AM PST by nutmeg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson