Posted on 12/02/2019 5:54:27 PM PST by yesthatjallen
.
Hannity shifted seamlessly to Durham - using silly logic to dismiss the Bombshell bringer, IG Horowitz.
The problem there is Paul Sperry wrote that Durham hired all Democrats as Prosecutors.
Sperry has been right over and over.
‘
Yeah.. Figured about the same.
“The problem there is Paul Sperry wrote that Durham hired all Democrats as Prosecutors.”
Oh, great.
Looks like it is going to take some pitchforks and torches to actually bring about justice and change for the good and for the people.
Don’t matter anymore..the rats and the swamp seem to be winning this fight because evil rules this world..goodness and truth is the minority now! Just buckle up and hang on! I’m just tired of this demonic evil circus! Seems NO one can stop them...NO ONE!!
If true it begs the question why didn't Republicans raise objections?
You can't really expect to beat the Deep State if you're not willing to put up a fight.
Guess the leak is true!! Fox news is reporting it..NOW YOU KNOW why the bitch whore came out of her hole!! She knew or got word that there would be no prosecution!! It makes sense now!! I feel so bad and sad for the president! No justice!!
Based on his past reports then I don’t really trust Horowitz. He was there during the Obama dictatorship, and when all of this was going down. so who knows what Horowitz is guilty of, and what he needs to hide.
On the the other hand this news is coming from the most unreliable deep state news source that exists. So it could be wrong.
Based on all the evidence that we have already seen then the only logical conclusion is that if Horowitz says what the WP says he is going to say.... Then he is just another really dirty cop.
As far as I’m concerned the jury is still out on Barr, he’s got a lot to say but does very little. However, if it comes down to a disagreement between Barr and Horowitz as to the interpretation of the facts, I’ll say that Barr is more independent than the IG. He wasn’t there when the activity took place, he played no role in it and he is not a party to it. Horowitz was there, supposedly in an oversight role, and he benefits from there not having been any misconduct (because then he didn’t somehow miss it all for three years).
Horowitz is a deep state Obongo appointment. Remember that and you won’t be surprised. If this story is true then we are looking at a total whitewash attempt as feared.
Horowitz is the same idiot that claimed there was no political bias in letting hillary go during their last investigation.
Same crap this time.
Barr will give this lip service and act shocked and upset, but in the end there will be no meaningful prosecutions.
If this sources our of the Washington post… It dubious at best.
Well I guess they’ll have to go back and spend more time to revised it. But don’t worry, the revised and improved report will be available in 2020, or maybe 2021, or possibly 2022 if they need to work on it more.
Yes, and I hope Barr will hold his feet to the fire in this. He was sent back to redo his report, and while of course the reason wasn’t disclosed, people here seems to think it had to do with protecting “friends.” Sounds like he’s still trying to do that.
Horowitz can’t prosecute anyone, he can only refer it to the DOJ. I don’t know if that will become public since Durham is already conducting an investigation.
The IG only has access to things that are currently within the F_I and D_J - that does *NOT* include the server(s). Barr has access to Durham + Huber and other means to know more & compare + contrast with William Binney analysis. Pompeo was recently pressed about this as well and said he retains beliefs about the DNC server as well (IG was dependent upon Crowdstrike just like the “11 intelligence agencies”)
The public sees the corrupt swamp runs deep.
where did you see or read that? That was true of Mueller but there is *NOTHING* that I’ve ever seen to that effect with Durham.
Anyone expect that Horowitz will score a commentator job at CNN if he spanners the FISA report gears? Soros had a lot of investment cash to spread around.
Horowitz can only report the facts that are already public knowledge. The FISA warrant was based on the illegitimate political opposition research from the DNC and was not verified. Its hard to argue that such egregious fraud is just “sloppy” or a “bureaucratic screwup”.
Barr is under no obligation to agree with the conclusions of the IG especially since he can apply the findings of Durham that have a much wider scope than Horowitz has. If Barr says its a crime it doesn’t matter what Horowitz might think.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.