Posted on 11/21/2019 6:00:09 AM PST by maggief
Fiona Hill, former National Security Council senior director for Europe and Russia, will testify before the House Intelligence Committee on Thursday, Nov. 21, in the impeachment probe into President Donald Trump. Hill told lawmakers in closed-door testimony last month that then-national security adviser John Bolton expressed concerns that the Trump administration was trying to pressure Ukrainian officials. The focus of the impeachment inquiry is a July 25 phone call in which Trump asked Ukraine's president to investigate 2020 presidential candidate Joe Biden.
(Excerpt) Read more at youtube.com ...
THANK YOU! I was getting worried... I know one thing, three days in a row may have been a mistake for even Schiff’s support base in this. But we need to endure because there needs to be some real witnesses who see it for themselves because we are NOT going to get the truth any other way.
Coming in now...
Here we go again!!!
Both of these “witnesses” were told by the WH NOT to testify but went against this.
That speaks volumes to me.....
NEVER TRUMPERS or DS or is that the same cat?
Another day of “I heard from someone who heard from someone.”
Based on the last three days of hearings, Barr should launch a criminal investigation into Democrat corruption and RICO abuses in collaboration with Ukraine.
That really annoys me. They should not be testifying unless the court says so and it’s upheld on appeal.
Another day of “I heard from someone who heard from someone.”
Based on the last three days of hearings, Barr should launch a criminal investigation into Democrat corruption and RICO abuses in collaboration with Ukraine.
Know what would be cool? If they just said “I’m going to help make this short for you, I am pleading the 5th”.
This may be a dumb question, but could all this “I overheard” or “I heard from so and so” just be a cover for a leak of the CIA or the NSA actually tapping and recording POTUS’ conversations?
“Hill told lawmakers in closed-door testimony last month that then-national security adviser John Bolton expressed concerns that the Trump administration was trying to pressure Ukrainian officials.”
More hearsay??? Why don’t they interview Bolton then? Even if they do, he could only testify as to his opinion.
So now this great Witness is going to testify to what she heard from someone giving their opinion on what they thought Trump might do. But didn’t do and this is the only proof they have! Jeez.
It is really sick how this setup allows Schiff for Brains to open each session with the worst, unproven accusations against the president, complete with whatever lies and speculations he cares to present as if they’re proven facts.
Don’t remember any other congressional committee hearing where the chairman behaved in such a manner.
As far as I am concerned anything is possible including Schiff being the real whistle blower.
I can’t plead the fifth, they don’t actually know anything, they only heard it from someone else who didn’t know anything either..
That is a good question, because with democrats it is never what you see in the hand they are showing you, it is always about what they have in the hand hidden behind their back.
THE SAME LAW FIRM THAT REPRESENTS VINDMAN REPRESENTS BURSIMA
Fiona Hill also mentioned.
“”””””As far as I am concerned anything is possible including Schiff being the real whistle blower.””””””
I’d say schiff and vindman are behind every bit of this.
Probably a sick fantasy of Schiff’s who dabbles in screen writing. I am being sarcastic.
The attorneys didn’t see a conflict?
Only with our republic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.