DACA was NOT an Executive Order from 0bama. It was a memo from Janet Napolitano!
A bare majority
Is that Different than a majority?
Because if it’s not, then why the #### say it? :)
Gee, he “gets” to end an unconstitutional non-law? That really mighty of them.
ITS WHOLESALE UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!! It should be a 9-0 vote to end it... but of course it won’t be.
What they’re not reporting is that the suit has nothing do do with the dreamers themselves. It is all about separation of powers. A program put into effect by an executive order of one president and ended by another president as it should be. The program should have been implemented by legislation, not by EO.
Executive orders can be rescinded by other presidents executive orders. Even lord grub obama did it.
If something is created by executive fiat it can be ended the same way. It was also extra-legal and should have been challenged immediately but our spineless RINOs refused to challenge ANYTHING obozo the lawless wannabe dictator did.
This should be pretty easy but after what happened in the Remington case earlier you NEVER know where these things will go.
When adults break the law the kids usually pay the price. These kids (many now adults) have only one set of people to be upset with: their parents.
It was never legal.
Obama made it up out of thin air.
Illegals come here pregnant in order to have their kids on American soil so they can get citizenship its that simple. They use their kids as pawns for freebies it should END
Very poorly written article. Also, questions asked is no indication on how they will rule. Roberts is likely to side with the Libs on this and he will find a way to say he has the right to do it but not in this way. The when Trump does it in the way outlined the lower courts will still rule against him and this will go back to the Supreme Court. The “justice” system is a complete joke. Why should it take them until June of 2020 to rule on this? I’d the system was working there would be a judgement inside of a month and they wouldn’t turn this into a campaign issue. The court should be moved out of DC into a rule area and the justices should have a best before date.
RE: While Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh appeared likely to say DACA was properly shut down, Chief Justice John Roberts did not seem to be as strongly convinced.
This sentence does not seems to fit the tone of the title of this article.
DACA eez CACA.
John Roberts caving in 3, 2, 1. . .
Roberts must have been compromised.
It’s the only thing that can explain his absurd Obamacare decision.
But that doesn’t mean those who own him call in their chits all the time.
They probably save it for a just a small number of matters.
Guess we’ll see if DACA is on that list.
Shouldn’t even be in court.
How about some executive review of judicial decisions for a change?
John Roberts is a globalist and a activist judge who legislates from the bench. Let’s hope he’s at a loss on this one.
Another slanted, poorly written article from the left.
If we are counting on Roberts to side with the constitution, we are likely to be disappointed.
IF the court gives Trump a victory, the question is “what will he do”? Many here at FR act as if these “dreamers” will be deported, but that is NOT gonna happen. IMHO, Trump would use a win to try to force Congress to spend the election year crafting a “comprehensive” immigration bill. He might even have a bill ready to go that he can submit to them. Whatever ends up on Trump’s desk, it will NOT make most here happy, and WILL include some level of amnesty, but hopefully not a path to citizenship or importing families. Trump makes deals. It’s what he does.
Then the question is “do Democrats again turn down a deal for the dreamers”? Do they give up their campaign issue? Do they piss off the voters by refusing to make a deal that Americans, if not Freepers, largely support? It seems either choice helps Trump, though the media will distort and mislead, as always. Is this a big part of Trump’s calculus to win reelection?
If an EO has sufficient authority to create a policy, then obviously an EO has sufficient authority to terminate it.
Wasn’t Constitutional in the first. Zero knew that even when he signed it.
If a program can be started by Executive Order, it can be ended by Executive Order. End of story.
This should be a 9-0 decision.