Fitton to Trump: Pardon everyone caught up in Mueller's web

1 posted on 10/26/2019 8:33:17 AM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Saw that. Fitton is clearly frustrated and rightfully so.

2 posted on 10/26/2019 8:36:16 AM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Beware the homeless industrial complex.)

To: E. Pluribus Unum

I suspect that if Flinn is found innocent due to fraud or illegal activity he can sue for to recover his lost house, lawyer fees and pain and suffering. These crooks in the FBI need to be put to ruin greater than what they caused and be an example to stop corruption in the future.

3 posted on 10/26/2019 8:37:22 AM PDT by mountainlion (Live well for those that did not make it back.)

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Fitton has done more to fight the communists Democrats than the damn Republican Senate has. I agree with him although not the best way but Trump should pardon all convictions by the communists during the witch hunt.

4 posted on 10/26/2019 8:39:46 AM PDT by Logical me

To: E. Pluribus Unum

A pardon for Flynn is pointless and counter-productive, because it implicitly acknowledges that he IS guilty of the crimes that are the subject of the pardon.

If I'm Flynn, the better approach is to have the charges dismissed due to a judicial finding of prosecutorial misconduct. That means I'm not just off the hook legally, but I've got all the standing I need to sue for compensatory and punitive damages that could run well into eight figures.

5 posted on 10/26/2019 8:41:55 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("In the time of chimpanzees I was a monkey.")

To: E. Pluribus Unum

After the 2020 election.

6 posted on 10/26/2019 8:49:16 AM PDT by Parley Baer

To: Alberta's Child

AMEN!!! NO ONE needs a PARDON!! They ALL are INNOCENT and I want them to SUE, SUE, SUE!

7 posted on 10/26/2019 8:51:59 AM PDT by Ann Archy (Abortion....... The HUMAN Sacrifice to the god of Convenience.)

“They ALL are INNOCENT and I want them to SUE, SUE, SUE”!

Damned right!!!

8 posted on 10/26/2019 9:04:37 AM PDT by laplata (The Left/Progressives have diseased minds.)

YOU BET!!! SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE

E SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE SUE

9 posted on 10/26/2019 9:40:14 AM PDT by Cobra64 (Common sense isnÂ’t common anymore.)

To: E. Pluribus Unum

When Fitton said that las night, we clapped! He is so right.

10 posted on 10/26/2019 9:42:03 AM PDT by MayflowerMadam ("I've read the back of The Book, and we win.")

To: E. Pluribus Unum

No. Make appeals court throw the charges out with prejudice, then begin disbarment proceedings, then start with criminal charges. Weissmann needs to be taken out. Then, when he’s on trial, see if he’ll talk about what Hillary told him.

11 posted on 10/26/2019 9:58:42 AM PDT by struggle

Weissmann has been a criminal for way too long, protected, uncharged and allowed to run amok and destroy peoples lives. His head ought to be the first one on the chopping block....then on with the dozens and dozens more who have turned the rule of law into a joke.

12 posted on 10/26/2019 10:43:53 AM PDT by Dawgreg

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Hey, I have a question......what about Paul Manafort? Is he really a criminal or was he railroaded just like so many more? I never see his name mentioned as a victim and is he still in solitary confinement???

13 posted on 10/26/2019 10:45:53 AM PDT by Dawgreg

To: E. Pluribus Unum

Just as I’ve said so many times before. Trump should use all the power the Constitution grants him. What are they going to do to him? Impeach him?

15 posted on 10/26/2019 10:55:41 AM PDT by lakecumberlandvet (Appeasement never works.)

To: E. Pluribus Unum

In trumps 2nd inaugural speech in 2020

16 posted on 10/26/2019 1:31:08 PM PDT by ronnie raygun (nic dip.com)

To: mountainlion

I suspect that if Flinn is found innocent due to fraud or illegal activity he can sue for to recover his lost house, lawyer fees and pain and suffering. These crooks in the FBI need to be put to ruin greater than what they caused and be an example to stop corruption in the future.

Not just in the government, but Fitton said that journalism was egging the government on to prosecute Manafort.
Adam Smith was correct in writing that “People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices.” My hobby horse is the fact that the wire services created continuous virtual meetings of all major journalism organizations - and that those meetings, in effect for a century and a half, could not fail and did not fail to create “a conspiracy against the public” which encompasses the entire journalism profession.
To ask “What is the conspiracy” is to ask, “What trust might journalists violate?” And the answer to that should be obvious - journalism has successfully propagandized the public to implicitly trust that “journalists are objective.” At best that cannot be true as a general proposition; objectivity is a laudable goal but not a state of being. Attempting objectivity is a demanding discipline which nobody actually enjoys, and which nobody can ever prove in real time that they are attaining.
Consequently journalists substitute unanimity - herd behavior - for serious efforts at objectivity. Journalists who go along with the herd, get along with the herd. Anyone claiming to be a journalist who does not substitute going along with the herd for a serious attempt at objectivity finds his/her credentials as a journalist "pecked to death” by journalists claiming that s/he is “not a journalist, not objective.”
The reason that the journalism cartel I have described has a strong socialist slant is the fact that journalism is about ^bad news. News, that is, which shows society in a less-than-favorable light, and suggests that government should “do something” to “solve” the “problem.” Worse, journalism has an incentive to promote nostrums which exacerbate problems instead of ameliorating them. Faux “solutions" produce bad news for society and that produces “great copy” for journalism. This incentive makes a mockery of the journalism cartel’s affectation that journalists define the public interest. Journalism’s interest is in interesting the public - but events the reports of which are bad news which interests the public are opposed to the public interest.
Sue journalism as a cartel and as a systematic libeler of society in general and Republicans in particular.

17 posted on 10/27/2019 11:13:28 AM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (Socialism is cynicism directed towards society and - correspondingly - naivete towards government.)

To: AdmSmith; AnonymousConservative; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; Bockscar; cardinal4; ColdOne; ...

18 posted on 10/28/2019 9:14:49 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794