Posted on 10/21/2019 1:18:00 PM PDT by Kaslin
I did a search and found that it was Norway that was occupied by Germany. I suppose that is an easy mistake to make, but he should have checked to make sure.
They may have mentioned Norway. That Norway was occupied is well-known: the name of the pro-Nazi Norwegian who was put in charge of the government, Quisling, became a common noun (used of similar collaborators in other occupied countries). An outfit like Fox should have some knowledgeable fact-checkers who know enough about World War II to know that Sweden was never occupied.
They play golf together. Rush has sung his praises.
I think he had a ghost writer in this book.Right off the getgo he called the USS Iowa a destroyer and the DD as the battleship.If he researched this as is claimed he would not have confused the two.A big frigging difference.The guy is not to be taken as credible.
Of the highest order.
WTF?
called the USS Iowa a destroyer and the DD as the battleship.
= = = = = = = = = = =
Tiny mistake EXCEPT for those that pay attention to FACT, not only detail.
That FooFaa is right up there with CorpsEman and the ‘I have visitied all 57 states’ as either poor editing or just plain ‘stoooopid’.
I think RL had pointed out in the past that you can tell if an ‘inexperienced’ person is reading if they say “AA” when the word a is normally pronounced as ‘uh’.
It does help when ‘sorting’ out the BS from the truth..-if they can’t pay attention enough to speak correctly and get something easily checked wrong, then it is hard to believe ANYTHING that follows.
Probably
Thanks for posting. But I cant help but acknowledging that essentially all of the responses were negative. That seems to be the norm around here these days.Did we miss your positive response somewhere on this thread?...Is that too negative for you?
If I write a book can I get on Limbaugh, Hannity, Ingraham, Tucker Carlson to promote it or does one have to be part of the media team to get free publicity?
It’s a small club, and we are not in it.
Exactly
Did we miss your positive response somewhere on this thread?...Is that too negative for you?
+++++
Yes you did miss it. I thanked Kaslin for posting a very informative article.
I suppose I could have posted something in defense of Bret Baier but why should I waste my time. The FR consensus appears to be that Baier is just another NeverTrumper, a title given out way too easily around here.
A honest debate would be better. We used to do that. Thats become a rare thing now. On the average we dont debate on the merits, We just follow the Party Line.
So I mostly reply to positive comments or to those who are willing to post more than just a one liner. I also tend to respond to Freepers who actually read the article. Even that is becoming rare.
But dont get me wrong. I love FR. It is still the best by a mile. But it is not the friendly place it once was.
A honest debate would be better. We used to do that. Thats become a rare thing now. On the average we dont debate on the merits, We just follow the Party Line.
Nonsense. IT’s the Never Trumpers who shut down debate, fire Pro-Trumpers, etc. We have the facts on our side. We are fine with debating.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.