Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Review of Russia Inquiry Grows as F.B.I. Witnesses Are Questioned
NYT ^ | Oct. 19, 2019 | Adam Goldman and William K. Rashbaum

Posted on 10/19/2019 7:11:33 AM PDT by yesthatjallen

The review, led by the prosecutor John Durham, has focused on former investigators who are frequent targets of President Trump.

Federal prosecutors reviewing the origins of the Russia investigation have asked witnesses pointed questions about any anti-Trump bias among former F.B.I. officials who are frequent targets of President Trump and about the earliest steps they took in the Russia inquiry, according to former officials and other people familiar with the review.

The prosecutors, led by John H. Durham, the United States attorney in Connecticut, have interviewed about two dozen former and current F.B.I. officials, the people said. Two former senior F.B.I. agents are assisting with the review, the people said.

The number of interviews shows that Mr. Durham’s review is further along than previously known. It has served as a political flash point since Attorney General William P. Barr revealed in the spring that he planned to scrutinize the beginnings of the Russia investigation, which Mr. Trump and his allies have attacked without evidence as a plot by law enforcement and intelligence officials to prevent him from winning the 2016 election.

Closely overseen by Mr. Barr, Mr. Durham and his investigators have sought help from governments in countries that figure into right-wing attacks and unfounded conspiracy theories about the Russia investigation, stirring criticism that they are trying to deliver Mr. Trump a political victory rather than conducting an independent review.

SNIP

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Russia; US: Connecticut; US: New York
KEYWORDS: 2020election; adamgoldman; barr; connecticut; dnctalkingpoint; dnctalkingpoints; election2020; johndurham; mediawingofthednc; newyork; newyorkcity; newyorkslimes; newyorktimes; partisanmediashills; presstitutes; putinsbuttboys; russia; smearmachine; trump; ukraine; williamkrashbaum
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
The NYT is creating the narrative the Durham/Barr investigations are nothing more than Trump seeking revenge on his political enemies.
1 posted on 10/19/2019 7:11:33 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

When the Slimes says “unfounded” that means it is true with metaphysical certainty!


2 posted on 10/19/2019 7:13:56 AM PDT by cgbg (Vote Trump or you will _be_ Trump)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Russian collusion hoax = Real
Investigating the origins of the Russian hoax = Right-wing, white-supremacist wacko conspiracy! Damnit, why can’t Drumpf just let us destroy him like we do to all other Republicans?


3 posted on 10/19/2019 7:15:38 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Ironic, since that was the reason for the Russian hoax and impeachment.


4 posted on 10/19/2019 7:15:40 AM PDT by outpostinmass2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

The NYT is pure propaganda.


5 posted on 10/19/2019 7:15:48 AM PDT by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

If they’re creating that narrative, then there’s a reason for it. I suspect the B-17 squadron is right over the target.


6 posted on 10/19/2019 7:15:55 AM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Knowledge makes a man unfit to be a slave." -- Frederick Douglass)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cgbg
“When the Slimes says “unfounded” that means it is true with metaphysical certainty!”

Has there ever, in recorded history, been an allegation (absurd or not) leveled against a conservative that was labeled “unfounded” in MSM reportage?

Yes, it’s a rhetorical question.

7 posted on 10/19/2019 7:17:59 AM PDT by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

It’s almost like they are accusing him of doing what they did.

Which would be an unprecedented tactic.


8 posted on 10/19/2019 7:20:18 AM PDT by chris37 (Where's Hunter?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Well so what! What they are trying to do is akin to trying to stop an Abrams tank by shooting tennis balls at it.


9 posted on 10/19/2019 7:21:45 AM PDT by DarthVader (Not by speeches & majority decisions will the great issues of the day be decided but by Blood & Iron)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: daler

The other dig is when they throw in “without evidence.”


10 posted on 10/19/2019 7:22:13 AM PDT by garyb (What if you can't trust the voice in your head?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

The Old Gray Whore is foolish in actively attempting to discredit the investigation.

Pissing into the wind is counter productive


11 posted on 10/19/2019 7:22:35 AM PDT by bert ( (KE. NP. N.C. +12) Progressives are existential American enemies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Closely overseen by Mr. Barr, Mr. Durham and his investigators have sought help from governments in countries that figure into right-wing attacks and unfounded conspiracy theories about the Russia investigation...

If the Dems did nothing wrong, and these are all conspiracy theories, then there is nothing to worry about with Dunham’s investigation. Right NYTimes?


12 posted on 10/19/2019 7:25:06 AM PDT by Flick Lives (MSM, the Enemy of the People since 1898)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
A good defense is a good offense.

They're trying to get ahead of the release of these investigations.

They're going on the offense that these investigations are purely political. When the reports are released this will be their defense.

13 posted on 10/19/2019 7:27:31 AM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

[Mr. Trump and his allies have attacked without evidence as a plot by law enforcement and intelligence officials to prevent him from winning the 2016 election.]


Murder investigations typically start with on the basis of suspicions. Only with a full investigation, can a determination as to whether those suspicions are correct be made. The Times doesn’t want an investigation to proceed because of what it might unearth.


14 posted on 10/19/2019 7:28:02 AM PDT by Zhang Fei (My dad had a Delta 88. That was a car. It was like driving your living room.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

some good clues in the article


His team has interviewed private Ukrainian citizens, a Justice Department spokeswoman has said without explaining why.


15 posted on 10/19/2019 7:28:36 AM PDT by janetjanet998
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

Leakers in the FBI and the NYTs trying to control the narrative before the investigation is released.


16 posted on 10/19/2019 7:30:13 AM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
Two former senior F.B.I. agents are assisting with the review, the people said

Hmmm....

17 posted on 10/19/2019 7:32:40 AM PDT by Jim Noble (There is nothing racist in stating plainly what most people already know)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen

NYT’s source is equivalent to “someone who breathed at some time”. They have descended to “fake leaking”.


18 posted on 10/19/2019 7:36:05 AM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Flick Lives

If the Dems did nothing wrong, and these are all conspiracy theories, then there is nothing to worry about with Dunham’s investigation. Right NYTimes?

************

Exactly right. If they’re so innocent they should welcome, if not push for, this investigation.


19 posted on 10/19/2019 7:40:22 AM PDT by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: yesthatjallen
...right-wing attacks and unfounded conspiracy theories about the Russia investigation...

Journalism. It's dead Jim.

20 posted on 10/19/2019 7:40:52 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson