Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Twitter will prevent users from retweeting world leaders who break its rules
Fox News ^ | 10/15/19 | Christopher Carbone

Posted on 10/15/2019 4:37:25 PM PDT by Faith Presses On

Twitter will restrict how users can interact with tweets from world leaders who violate its rules.

The social media company led by CEO Jack Dorsey said in a Tuesday blog post that it will not allow users to like, reply, share or retweet offending tweets, but it will let users quote-tweet them so they can still express their own opinions.

The San Francisco-based company has faced a backlash from critics over its hateful conduct and content moderation policies. Some organizations and users believe it should subject the tweets of leaders like President Trump to the same standards as everyone else on the platform.

(snip)

Twitter listed several areas that will result in enforcement action, even if the account involved is a public figure: promotion of terrorism; clear and direct threats of violence against an individual; posting private information; posting or sharing intimate photos or videos of someone that were produced or shared without consent; engaging in behaviors related to child sexual exploitation; and encouraging or promoting self-harm.

In cases involving a world leader, the company said that it will "err on the side of leaving the content up if there is a clear public interest in doing so."

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS: california; censorship; devinnunes; jackdorsey; retweets; trumptwitter; twitter; worldleaders
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last
To: Faith Presses On

Election interference? Absolutely!


21 posted on 10/15/2019 5:24:37 PM PDT by Perseverando (For Progressives, Islamonazis, Statists, Commies & other DemoKKKrats: It's all about PEOPLE CONTROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Faith Presses On

Screen shot.


22 posted on 10/15/2019 5:51:17 PM PDT by yesthatjallen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Faith Presses On

All these rules are being made ad hoc for Trump.


23 posted on 10/15/2019 5:51:41 PM PDT by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Faith Presses On

I wonder which “world leader” they are aiming this at?

Rhetorical question.


24 posted on 10/15/2019 5:52:04 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (We cannot spare this man. He fights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Faith Presses On

What clowns & they are not funny. Break them up. They violate the First Amendment & antitrust laws.


25 posted on 10/15/2019 5:56:52 PM PDT by Trumpisourlastchance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Faith Presses On

This is election interference. “We won’t silence Trump, but we’ll throttle his supporter’s speech.”


26 posted on 10/15/2019 6:00:15 PM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shadow44

Or break up Big Tech like they did the telecoms.


27 posted on 10/15/2019 6:01:59 PM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

Breaking them up wouldn’t do anything other than cause them to be disorganized temporarily, the new social media companies would coordinate exactly the same way Facebook, Google, Twitter, and Apple already do.

It needs to be made explicit that this systemic deplatforming and censorship is illegal.


28 posted on 10/15/2019 6:11:14 PM PDT by Shadow44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

Break them up now!


29 posted on 10/15/2019 6:11:26 PM PDT by Phillyred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Faith Presses On

How are these rules different?


30 posted on 10/15/2019 6:19:06 PM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Faith Presses On

Admission that Twitter wasn’t supposed to delete President Trump’s postings since they are “public record” and that violates retention rules?


31 posted on 10/15/2019 8:03:19 PM PDT by a fool in paradise (Denounce DUAC - The Democrats Un-American Activists Committee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Faith Presses On

The solution is obvious. It would also be a huge opportunity for some technology entrepreneur. Create a website that simply Harvest tweets from Trump and other world leaders, and creative space in which they can be liked and shared to other social media. Problem solved.


32 posted on 10/16/2019 7:15:19 AM PDT by backwoods-engineer (Enjoy the decline of the American empire.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-32 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson