Posted on 10/11/2019 4:23:51 AM PDT by ConservativeStatement
You forgot to put quotation marks around “normal” in your post. LOL!
So the whole of alphabet people are about 3% of society, leaving 97% male/female. So 48.5% are women. Should be easy to find one.
Now... finding the right one...
Respectfully, I think you misunderstood her response. It was not a pitch to the middle. Her response tells that hypothetical concerned Christian who thinks marriage is between one man and one woman to mind their own business and to marry one woman “assuming you can find one” meaning if he can find one that would actually be willing to marry someone like him. It’s intended as an insult. The left is loving this and calling it an epic “burn” on social media.
She just lost the muzzie vote.
What if it is one of the other 100+ genders that liberals say beside the two GOD created? Ms SpeakingBull, what would you say then?
Warren is playing to all the man hating, baby murdering lesbians out there. Keep a close eye on her numbers!
I rather have president Warren than president Biden, in case Trump either loses or decides not to run. Biden is the king of swamp corruption.
So hypocritical for a busybody tyrant like Warren to suggest “live and let live”. She wants government running everything.
“Yep, women are hard to find.”
She had a nice answer until she added “assuming you can find one”.
That was either rude to the man asking the question or a suggestion that there not many out there that she considers to be women.
Not anyone near a Sistuh Soldjah moment as the guy in question would not be a Warren supporter. It was Clinton critiquing a leftist.
If I understand her correctly, she’s saying that the shortage of women is why guys turn to guys?
“Quite the burn”?
No, it was quite the shot in her own foot.
Politely accusing him of being an inferior incel. Ignoring the fact that men who are denied opportunities for family and connection come back and burn down the village.
Yes, it was intended like when a smug lib says to a pro-life person: “Don’t like abortion? Well, then don’t have one.”
“Respectfully, I think you misunderstood her response. It was not a pitch to the middle...”
Sounds like a planted question after all. Remember, NOTHING happens by accident with Democrats. They’re too careful for that.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3786162/posts
Yea, that was nasty. But for ‘events’ like town halls by candidates, one would have to be really be an idealist to think that the people participating are there by chance, rather than a very careful selection...and same for the questions - at least for Democrats [Republicans are too stupid to figure this out for their own events]
OK, we still are not on the same page. The issue was not whether it was planted. These things usually are planned, I agree. What I took issue with was your characterization of it as a pitch to the middle. It was a pitch to the left. She was taking a jab at those who think marriage is only between a man and a woman. The “assuming you can find one” poked fun at the hypothetical bigoted man and his chances of finding a woman who would want to be with someone as awful as him. That zinger is why this went viral and was loved by the leftists.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.