Skip to comments.Trump calls for Pelosi, Schiff impeachment over whistleblower actions
Posted on 10/06/2019 10:57:31 PM PDT by conservative98
President Trump on Sunday tweeted that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., should be impeached over their handling of the whistleblower investigation.
Trump said Pelosi was aware of "Shifty Adam Schiff" and his "massive frauds perpetrated upon Congress and the American people. Trump pointed to Schiff's parody speech in Congress. Pelosi defended the speech and called it fair.
Trump was also apparently eluding to reports that Schiff's false earlier claim that the unnamed whistleblower did not speak to his committee.
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
Nancy Pelosi knew of all of the many Shifty Adam Schiff lies and massive frauds perpetrated upon Congress and the American people, in the form of a fraudulent speech knowingly delivered as a ruthless con, and the illegal meetings with a highly partisan Whistleblower & lawyer...— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 7, 2019
....This makes Nervous Nancy every bit as guilty as Liddle Adam Schiff for High Crimes and Misdemeanors, and even Treason. I guess that means that they, along with all of those that evilly Colluded with them, must all be immediately Impeached!— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 7, 2019
Well it ain’t gonna be a boring month, October, that’s for sure.
Good catch ... don’t we have editors anymore?
apparently not. that mistake is hugh, and series! :)
And someone had to call out the idiotic author's stupidity! "Eluding" is the antithesis is what was meant!
And obviously either there are NO editors any more, or IF there are, they're IMBECILES!
[ Trump calls for Pelosi, Schiff impeachment over whistleblower actions ]
Excellent. Put them both in prison for sedition.
Yeah, “alluding” should have been used.
Their our know edit-oars.
See what I mean! LOL
I'm usually NOT one of the spelling/grammar police types; however, word usage...you bet I am! Words have set meanings!
Well when you see gross error....sigh. It’s hard not to comment.
I get in too much of a hurry because I’m always trying to do about 11 things at once. Even now.
So I make a lot of typos.
But a news organization, they could maybe, dunno, hire a few editors.
I remember at one job when there was a stern letter from the back office with the ending:
“I except your cooperation!”
Not “expect” but “except” so I guess we didn’t have to cooperate at all.
Usually “October Surprises” happen in election years...
I went to the article...and it seems they already fixed it.
Please edumadcate us..
May have been a better dem strategy to have all this going on next Oct.
Not that it has helped them.
I think it has hurt.
Speculation on this “second whistleblower” (2ndWB).
2ndWB is claimed to have first-hand knowledge of Trump saying that which must not be said.
Dems realize they’re getting beat up by not having a whistleblower with first-hand knowledge.
1stWB goes back to his source and encourages him to sign on with the same law firm.
I predict we’ll learn that 2ndWB is the ‘first-hand’ source for 1stWB’s complaint.
imbeciles everywhere,,,And I didn’t CAP....I guess...I’m a mellie...I’ve heard they call them that.............
You don’t impeach members of congress...you “expel” them w/a super-majority vote:
President Trump could maybe use a “Tweet cross-checker” that gives them that “last look-over”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.