I take it back. I just took him off my DVR.
Bye bye Tucker
I think Tucker needs reassurance that some people listen to him.
Lonely, imbecile who sporadically makes sense, but never truly is consistent.
THERE WAS NOTHING INAPPROPRIATE ABOUT THAT CALL.
I wasn’t a fan from previous shows, like Crossfire, I think, where I thought he was an idiot. But I thought I would give him a try, and sure enough, he reaches the end of his usefulness, as he usually does, and blew getting me as a viewer.
Tucker, once a creep always a creep.
I disagree with Carlson on this one. I believe that Trump was far more interested in rooting out corruption in general since he also talked about Crowdstrike and the Clinton server. He said Ukraine had a lot of knowledge about the Russia Hoax and would like to get to the bottom of that. I really believe that the dems are far more concerned about Ukraine giving Trump into on Crowdstrike than they are about exposing the Bidens as a father son team of corruption
If only we knew what presidents like Clinton, Obama and even G. W. Bush said to foreign leaders during phone calls, I’d bet we’d be quite surprised.
That is a good example of the difference between Republicans and democrats.
Democrats, if by chance they disagree, will maintain a solid front, or just won’t say anything.
Republicans, on the other hand, impelled by their prissy-assed stupidity, will chime with the democrats and condemn.
Fox News bosses told him to get in line. He has a conservative audience, and they want to make use of him.
Tucker has alway been a C. Sometimes rises to B-. Soft bellied with no deep principles.
Like a lot of things Trump does, it was pretty over-the-top. ........................... You betcha! 2020 we need lots of over the top. (Hidden OK sign),come and get it.
https://dailycaller.com/2019/10/03/tucker-and-patel-truth-about-impeachment/
The key question with Trump’s Ukraine call, though, is whether the president’s actions, advisable or not, rise to the level of an impeachable offense. It’s hard to argue they do. The president did not, as was first reported, offer a quid pro quo to the Ukrainians. He did not condition any U.S. support on a Biden investigation. The Justice Department has already looked at the totality of the call and determined that Trump did not break the law.Impeaching a president is the most extreme and anti-democratic remedy we have in our system of government. A fundamental cornerstone of our entire system is to respect the will of the voters. The American people elected Trump president of the United States, though a huge part of our political class has never been able to stomach it. They think Trump is unfit to be our president. They definitely don’t want to address seriously the issues that drove voters to the radical step of voting in Trump as our president — issues such as income inequality, economic stagnation and our broken immigration system. It’s easier to pretend that this was all the result of a few Russian Facebook ads or because the same American people who had just elected Barack Obama somehow transformed overnight into a bunch of racists.
That’s it for him. I’m sure he was a rootless cosmopolitan globalist pearl-clutching traitor all along, and he probably used kabbalist mind control to fool people.
No one has to like or agree with everything Trump says and does in order to be a supporter and that includes Tucker. However, didn’t you guys also read that Tucker said it was neither illegal or impeachable? That was the important part of this article to me and NOT the spin CNN put on it.
Look at the headline, Tucker. You gave the anti-Trumpers a gift. With friends like you...
PS: FUTC
The enemy is inside the wire!
STFU Tucker!
Tucker, how often does your spouse beat you?
"Treaty with Ukraine on Mutual Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters", Treaty Document 106-16. Approved in 1999 under President Clinton. In Senate records and downloadable as a PDF - 31 pages.
Authorizes mutual assistance in criminal investigations.
Trump is following the law, not violating it.
I see it like this. If a US President has info that leads him to think someone running for the highest office in the land is massively corrupt, like the Biden’s clearly are, then it’s his duty to expose that corruption and let the American people decide if they want someone corrupt for President. Obviously many do because surprisingly Hillary got more than 50 votes.
Until I see video, I don’t believe it.
Are people here so quick to buy what CNN is selling?
#FakeNews
I like Tucker. Do I agree with everything he says? Of course not. But he shows up the idiocy of the left nearly every night, and is not afraid to laugh out loud at their hypocrisy. I think he’s wrong about the phone call, and I wouldn’t be surprised if he doesn’t even like Trump. But I think he has enough integrity to defend him and his policies most of the time, in spite of that, because it’s the right thing to do. And I call that fairness.