what is the correct protocol for a president to root out corruption of his predecessors, especially when info was manipulated to affect the election, i wonder.
He’s an entertainer, first and foremost. Politics is his passion.
Looking at it through the eyes of a D.C. Insider, where investigating democrats for just about any crime was against the law until very recently.
Watching only ‘the good shows’ on Fox News is like trying to pick up a turd from the ‘clean’ end.
It was cool by me Tucker. No quid pro Joe.
Tucker, do you remember what 0bama and his administration did to political enemies? Journalist? Republicans?
Private companies?
Tucker, get your mind straight.
5.56mm
CNN?
Who believes this?
Hey Tucker...read this and STFU.
“Donald Trump should not have been on the phone with a foreign head of state encouraging another country to investigate his political opponent, Joe Biden,”
Which may explain why he didn’t. I like Tucker but I think I’ll go with Greg Jerrett on this one.
So sad to see such lies bring spread in the mass media. It’s always appropriate for a president to speak with foreign leaders and his call was one hundred percent legitimate too. This commentator is either mistaken or sold out to the soroznazi - deep state usurpation campaign. There’s a lot of money trying to get rid of president trump. Money without any scruples morals principles. It’s all slander and the Nazi big lie technique. All
Over again.
It was inappropriate. It’s also the kind of thing that the government does all the time. Trump’s problem was getting caught (if he did do it and did get caught doing it). Much of what presidents, governments, and campaigns do is “inappropriate.” But they do it in such a way that nobody finds out about it.
Carlson works for FNC and they can tell him in what direction they want him to go. Of course he can refuse and then he would have to quit and give up his multi million dollar salary. Not an easy choice.
Tucker is great. It’s just that he had an initial and persistent dislike toward Trump. Rush dod too. So did Mark Levin. With Tucker it comes out once in a while.
Tucker is one of those who thinks it’s ok to see both sides even when the one side is trying to destroy to no end. Which he does not see.
With Rush you can see he doesn’t get Trump even still
Mark is wise
I hesitantly started watching him recently because I vividly remember his bowtie days when he fancied himself a mini-George Will.
Won’t be watching anymore.
“Trump should not have been on the phone with a foreign head of state encouraging another country to investigate his political opponent, Joe Biden”
Why not...dick? Does being a political opponent confer immunity for crimes?
Another reason to dump Fox for One America News. OAN is what Fox used to pretend to be
Looks like this is being taken out of context. I think what Tucker is saying is that what Trump did was stupid but not worthy of impeachment. Actually on his shows last week he was making fun of Democrats. He even had a montage of Pelosi saying it was a sad day calling for impeachment of the President.
I love Trump! I voted for him, plan to vote for him again.
But Tucker is right, Trump did get a little too specific by naming the lead demoncratic runner to be investigated. Had he stuck to general corruption or just naming the company he would have been fine.....I know, there was no quid pro quo but discretion is the better part of valor.....
I’ll fight to support Trump.....
Has anyone considered the possibility that the only reason Biden is running for President is to insulate himself from criticisms or investigations into his corruption???
Tucker Carlson is “right wing”?