Skip to comments.
Could President Trump be impeached and convicted – but also reelected? [Academic Insanity]
The Conversation ^
| October 1, 2019
| Austin Sarat
Posted on 10/01/2019 9:08:02 PM PDT by familyop
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Looks like Austin Sarat, "Professor of Jurisprudence and Political Science, Amherst College," wants an ongoing civil conflict. Is he hoping for a revolution with the outcome of hard socialism? Just how many academics have gone that far over the edge?
I only excerpted that much, because the outrageous conclusion is at the bottom of the article and would otherwise be missed by many readers. Before the end of the article, the professor made arguments against disqualification.
1
posted on
10/01/2019 9:08:02 PM PDT
by
familyop
To: familyop
It depends. Congress may, but doesn’t have to, declare a person ineligible to “hold any office of trust or profit under the United States.” It can be part of the penalty if the president or any other official is impeached and removed.
They chose not to do it when they impeached and convicted Judge Alcee Hastings, which is why he is now a Congressman.
If they were to include that disability in their removal of President Trump, then he could not be re-elected. But if not, then theoretically he could.
2
posted on
10/01/2019 9:12:46 PM PDT
by
TBP
(Progressives lack compassion and tolerance. Their self-aggrandizement is all that matters.)
To: familyop
That’s what baseball bats were made for.
No that is NOT a threat against this guy, it was a comedic comment on what seems to be the weapon of choice in certain NYC areas.
Can’t be too careful these day with what you say :)
3
posted on
10/01/2019 9:13:21 PM PDT
by
dp0622
(Bad, bad company Till the day I die.)
To: familyop
4
posted on
10/01/2019 9:14:30 PM PDT
by
Berlin_Freeper
(Another day younger and wiser.)
To: familyop
Yes, we are a nation of people, and our President, not the House, the Senate or the courts and the people would reelect Trump no matter what the House and Senate do to destroy him.
5
posted on
10/01/2019 9:15:35 PM PDT
by
Meatspace
To: familyop
heed Alexander Hamiltons advice ////
Hamilton’s advice is not a legal document.
This is all absurd conjecture anyway, since there aren’t 67 votes in the senate to convict. I doubt if there’s 40.
6
posted on
10/01/2019 9:17:11 PM PDT
by
Ceebass
(The only thing Orwell got wrong was the date)
To: familyop
To: TBP
Congress may, but doesnt have to, declare a person ineligible to hold any office of trust or profit under the United States. It can be part of the penalty if the president or any other official is impeached and removed.
I did not know that.
8
posted on
10/01/2019 9:20:55 PM PDT
by
JoSixChip
(I'm an American Nationalist)
To: dp0622
Out here, outside the metropolitan area, we have all those evil weapons of war that Beto warned you about, in the tens of millions, along with hunting rifles, pistols of all kinds, shotguns, rimfire weapons, knives, swords, machetes, and trillions of rounds of ammunition. Most of us get more range time than policemen and soldiers or at least have a passing knowledge of our weapons and marksmanship. I shot “expert” with the M-16A1 but somehow was only a “marksman” with the hand grenade.
9
posted on
10/01/2019 9:29:00 PM PDT
by
2ndDivisionVet
(You can't invade the mainland US. There'd be a rifle behind every blade of grass.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
WOW.
Don’t want to bring a bat to that fight :)
Hand grenade. Geez.
I’ve used an M4, SCAR, Glock and a shotgun that i don’t remember at ranges.
Only did well with the M4.
10
posted on
10/01/2019 9:32:00 PM PDT
by
dp0622
(Bad, bad company Till the day I die.)
To: 2ndDivisionVet
"...along with hunting rifles..."
Bolts: in the hands of men of ingenuity, some of the best weapons of war in existence.
11
posted on
10/01/2019 10:32:21 PM PDT
by
familyop
("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
To: familyop
I looked him up, he is a LEFTARD from the Woodstock days.
Against the death penalty, racism...
He is a Lefty hero, a University-dweller sheltered from the Communism he espouses by fat paychecks, Cadillac healthcare plans and unlimited perks.
A Bolshevik who poisons kids minds for 50 years now.
12
posted on
10/01/2019 10:35:29 PM PDT
by
wac3rd
(Somewhere in Hell, Ted Kennedy snickers....)
To: familyop
Could President Trump be impeached and convicted but also reelected? No.
Assuming the Senate invokes the clause barring future government service, he would be subject to the "fail to qualify" portion of the 20th amendment.
-PJ
13
posted on
10/01/2019 10:36:39 PM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
(The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
To: familyop
I only excerpted that much, because the outrageous conclusion is at the bottom of the article and would otherwise be missed by many readers. Before the end of the article, the professor made arguments against disqualification..
Yep it looks like it!
14
posted on
10/01/2019 10:49:57 PM PDT
by
tallyhoe
To: familyop
Well I think it depends on Attorney General Barr.. If Barr moves fast enough he will start indicting people before the Dems really get moving on their Impeachment Hearing.. Thus they might vote to impeach and then the Senate will not convict..
15
posted on
10/01/2019 10:54:35 PM PDT
by
tallyhoe
To: wac3rd
"I looked him up, he is a LEFTARD from the Woodstock days.
Against the death penalty, racism...
He is a Lefty hero, a University-dweller sheltered from the Communism he espouses by fat paychecks, Cadillac healthcare plans and unlimited perks.
A Bolshevik who poisons kids minds for 50 years now."
Thanks for the info, wac3rd!
16
posted on
10/01/2019 10:57:32 PM PDT
by
familyop
("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
To: wac3rd
Another parasite on the body politic, hatched in the ghetto of academia. They are usually the ones who feel most threatened by powerful people, as well they might.
To: Political Junkie Too
"Assuming the Senate invokes the clause barring future government service, he would be subject to the 'fail to qualify' portion of the 20th amendment."
Wouldn't disqualification be done with a separate vote after conviction?
18
posted on
10/01/2019 11:03:04 PM PDT
by
familyop
("Welcome to Costco. I love you." - -Costco greeter in the movie, "Idiocracy")
To: familyop
You mean like tactical pistol crossbows? I am shopping for a few now.
19
posted on
10/01/2019 11:14:21 PM PDT
by
MarMema
To: familyop
I think so. That's what happened with Alcee Hastings. He was impeached, convicted, and removed from the judiciary, but not barred from future office.
He subsequently ran for Congress and won.
-PJ
20
posted on
10/01/2019 11:30:50 PM PDT
by
Political Junkie Too
(The 1st Amendment gives the People the right to a free press, not CNN the right to the 1st question.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson