Judges don’t have this authority. It is interference and the judge can be charged for it.
The judge is doing the right thing. If you were under indefinite investigation you’d want a judge to push for something.
It’s not hard to charge someone with lying to the FBI. As seen in the Flynn case.
Im confused but I am thinking the way you are thinking. Why is a judge involved if no indictment has been handed down? Not that I don’t want to see one soon.
“Judges don’t have this authority. It is interference and the judge can be charged for it.”
I was about to ask if there is a case between the DOJ and McCabe before this judge? Otherwise, I see where he has no authority to involve himself in their investigation at all, much less to issue orders affecting ongoing investigations.
Strange times we’re in.