Posted on 09/25/2019 1:19:14 PM PDT by 2harddrive
One of the founders of Crowdstrike is Dimitry Alperovitch, a Ukrainian oligarch, and it is also partly funded by Victor Pinchuk, another Ukrainian oligarch who is a big donor to the Clinton Foundation.
This is turning into Godfather 3 with so many twists and turns.
Soros better watch out for the guy that shows up in his office wearing eyeglasses. ;-)
There’s going to be a huge chain-of-custody issue if it ever becomes evidence in a US Court!
Once you destroy evidence you surrender that argument.
/////////////////////////////////////////////
Makes sense to me. Thanks for the response.
Crowdstrike:
Gerhard Watzinger, Chairman of the Board.
Gerhard Watzinger has served as Chairman of our board
of directors since April 2012. From April 2013 to September
2013, he served as the chief executive officer for IGATE Corp
oration, an IT services company. Watzinger served as the
executive vice president for corporate strategy and mergers
& acquisitions of the McAfee business unit of Intel.
Watzinger joined McAfee in November 2007 upon McAfee’s
acquisition of SafeBoot Corp., a global leader in data
protection software, where he served as ceo from
February 2004 to November 2007. He currently serves on the
board of directors of Mastech Digital, Inc., a digital
transformation and information technology services company
and Absolute Software, a persistent software company.
Watzinger holds an advanced degree in Computer Science from
the University of Applied Sciences in Munich.
LOL.
Republicans Hired DNC’s Cyber-Firm CrowdStrike, Got Hacked in 2018
https://dailycaller.com/2018/12/04/nrcc-crowdstrike-dnc-hack/
Email chains are protected because the recipient has a copy too so they can’t really be faked because it is so easy to prove. Unless someone has gone through and leaned up all the other servers which would be a monumental task
That’s why they never said anything about the earlier release of the dnc emails because they knew they couldn’t deny any of it.
Democrat media caught off guard.
Slate: What “Server” Is Trump Babbling About?
Market Watch: Trump mentioned CrowdStrike to Ukrainian president, and CrowdStrike doesn’t seem to know why
[the Market Watch article and Slate both have background on the subject, quoted below from Market Watch]
“With regards to our investigation of the DNC hack in 2016, we provided all forensic evidence and analysis to the FBI,” CrowdStrike said in a statement. “As we’ve stated before, we stand by our findings and conclusions that have been fully supported by the U.S. Intelligence community.”
When asked specifically again why Trump would possibly be mentioning CrowdStrike by name, the spokeswoman said CrowdStrike had no further comment.
CrowdStrike had been hired by the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee in 2016 to assist in an investigation into a hack of the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton’s campaign.
I don’t think Trump wanted a copy of the server - he wants Ukraine to assist our AG in an investigation of that and the events leading to the FAKE Russian collusion business.
Presidents have a right to have investigations of lawbreakers but he would not have a right to make up stuff and set up false witnesses to have an investigation.
Holy Toledo, that could explain a lot of the GOP House retirements. Hacked and blackmailed.
Bkmrk.
Rush mentioned something today about Crowdstrike saying that Russia had hacked Ukraine’s systems and caused them to accidentally kill their own soldiers, but that Ukraine denied this event, that there was no killing of their own, and that it never happened.
I’m learning more and more about the nefarious inner workings of our government because of President Trump. I’ve thought for years that it was a cesspool in DC, but every day, I learn that it’s even filthier than I thought.
The FBI never examined the Democratic server after it was hacked.
The Democrats hired Crowdstrike to examing the server and they reported to the FBI that it was the Russians.
The FBI (Mueller, Stzrok, McCabe) took Crowdstrike’s analysis without any question as valid. That is according to the Mueller Report.
If the Ukraine has anything on the DNC server hack, then it could show Crowdstrike was lying to the FBI.
That would immediately trigger subpoenas and indictments from the Trump DOJ for Crowdstrike executives.
Would they flip?
Or would the DNC bribe them enough?
How much has the DNC bribed people to stay quiet?
How much money have they spent from their war chest?
It doesn’t matter. Either way, Trump is on offense and the Democrats are on defense.
Good point,
but I was more concerned about the political nature of the data that is on the server.
There are probably lots of information on that server that the DNC wouldn’t want the RNC to know, that’s not criminal but political in nature. So you want someone reviewing it for the crimes being investigated but there should be some protection of confidential DNC information. (Even though I hope the DNC fails at everything and dies a fast very painful death never to be resurrected. Deathwish Directed at the org not individuals.
Get the car battery, a generator, some electrical leads and demonstrate the power of electricity to the individual being interrogated.
> If the Democrats had asked for a copy of an RNC server, we’d be outraged.
Bull$hit. The president is over the DOJ and the FBI. FBI criminally dropped the ball on the Klinton email investigation. What is wrong with you.
> This is turning into Godfather 3 with so many twists and turns.
It has all been discussed by George Web and others for two years.
I’m not saying we shouldn’t have asked for it. There are crimes and investigations that are still ongoing where we need it and it needs to be looked at.
I’m just saying that the non-criminal information on that server is political in nature and the right thing to do is respect that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.