What does an official inquiry mean?
Honest answers please because I’m not a constitutional scholar. Or even close.
Is there ANYTHING real here?
Nancy and the Democrats couldn’t care less about the Constitution—it was written by dead white slaveholder men.
These absolute scum would try to convict someone they know is totally innocent. Just about as sorry as it gets.
Oooohhhhhh.....
An Impeachment Inquiry.
Was she face down on the floor kicking her feet?
If we had an actual free press, some reporter would have asked her to name even one action.
Pelosi and the Democrats last mistake. The angel of death is coming.
She didn’t “pull the trigger.” She’s using the same nonsense rhetoric that Nadler is. Nothing changed. The House as a whole has to vote to initiate an impeachment investigation. “Impeachment inquiry” has no legal meaning, see “collusion.”
They took the bait.
These people are seriously out to lunch.
Trump hasn’t done something even close to justifying impeachment.
What is going to happen, is that more and more democRats are going to see the party for the insane fools they are, and jump ship.
Rush was playing some comments by someone in the know in Minnesota. Evidently there’s a big drift from the demoncRats to the Republicans (well Trump support anyway) up there.
Now more of this stuff.
Folks have had it.
Unfortunately there isn’t one republican with a set of nuts standing up to defend Trump. WTF?
Only thing she did is to advertise and announce what the democrats have been doing for many months now. Nothing new, other than trying to make it officially known what the democrats have been up to.
Meant to placate their base, who voted in the democrats who promised impeachment, no matter what the cause, real or imagined or fabricated.
There was an argument between Nadler and Jim Jordan on the Judiciary committee in the last week. Nadler invited a contracted lawyer to ask questions of Trump’s 2016 campaign lawyer Corey Lewandowski.
Allowing a non-employee to question was a violation of standing house rules, including the rules that Nadler had just gotten revised by the house last week.
Nadler kept saying it was standard practice in impeachment inquiries. And Jordan kept saying this wasn’t an impeachment inquiry.
I suspect that Pelosi’s announcement especially since Trump has already approved a transcript release is in part to quell that debate.
I suspect Pelosi knows this is a bad move for Democrats, and unlike previous impeachments they aren’t even submitting the start of the inquiry to a house vote. Maybe she just got tired of it.
They don’t have anything impeachable. And they won’t get anything from this inquiry. And any impeachment vote is going to fail just like the others.
Impressive that they can do that with no crime or real evidence. Maybe they think that Harry Potter is real and will cast a spell to save them from looking like the partisan idiots they are.
WOULD it be okay if the President would have witheld aid if it was corruption that was uncovered that involved a Republican Senator or a Republican Congress person. I mean if there is corruption, shouldn’t it be investigated whatevery party, and even if the person has begun a campaign. It will be hard to prove that the President was motivated by personal vengance, when it was Rudy Gulianti the lawyer who was trying to absolve his client for misdeeds they still think he committed. WE ARE AT A CONSTITUTIONAL CRISIS.
First they have to get 218 Democrat votes in the House, and that’s not nearly a foregone conclusion.
Even if they manage that, 67 votes to convict in the Senate. In other words, it’s DOA there.
They’re probably looking at this as a way to get the tax returns, or perhaps to distract the American people from any upcoming revelations about Biden and other Democrat corruption.
These people are about to reap their own destruction and they have assured President Trump of re-election.
Impeach Pelosi.
Charge her with Sedition.
*** TAP TAP TAP TAP ***
(that is the sound of Pelousy tap dancing for the benefit of her gutter-level voting base....)