[Rummyfan]

...I once believed that “science” was a rigorous process where you tested theories and revised those theories in response to objective evidence.

Yes but the climate alarmists claim the science is complete and the consensus is that we are destroying the planet. Never mind that (1) consensus is politics, not science and (2) almost all conclusions are based on computer models, and I don't believe we have yet programmed a model that accurately predicts such a complicated thing such as our climate.

[5th MEB]

Damn computers can’t accurately predict the weather for tomorrow morning; much less a week, a month, a year, or a decade into the future.

I have a big rock outside that’s more accurate; if it’s wet, it rained last night, or it’s raining now.
If it’s dry, it didn’t rain.