Posted on 09/02/2019 8:13:14 AM PDT by mplc51
Big problem is Mueller’s gang has affiliates wearing black robes.
BOOM!
Very true.
But they don’t control the bully pulpit or completely dominate Twitter, like a certain person does. All it takes is one tweet, even if it’s him forwarding one from another person, and BOOOOOMMMMMM!!!!!!!!!!!
not a lawyer and I wouldn’t want to be one.
But if collusion between officers of the court and presiding judges can be proved, can a RICO case be made.
these scumbag lawyers need to be held to account and actually face serious punishment instead of the meaningless (and temporary if they happen at all) act of being disbarred.
Motions aren’t “bombshells”, decisions or rulings can be.
Powell is Mueller’s fearless nemesis.
GO SYDNEY!!
True, however, President Trump can change the game rather quickly by declassifying or granting clearance to Sidney Powell, for the document she so desires to review.
Motions aren’t “bombshells”,Unless you're Gen.Flynn...Which you aren't.
At one time the postings of articles from GP were like watching the old 60s Batman series.
Defense lawyers routinely file all kinds of motions to get cases dismissed. Some work, some don’t. Some are outright crazy, others are clever if the work. But until you get a ruling you just dont know.
Thats Great!..Lets see if they out themselves as members of the “Deep State” at the Supreme Court level...
Wondering if this is the result of the report that was released last week on Comey!
Boom! Shirley we can finally expect a whole lot of nothing to happen any minute now. Shirley
Roberts already has.
If it’s a rat Judge forget it
ITEM Comey didn’t inform Trump about a lot concerning the dossier.
ITEM Comey failed to tell Trump that Michael Flynn was under investigation, among many, many other things.
ITEM Spies in the White House were obfuscating the truth concerning the DNC/Hillary-financed Steele dossier.
ITEM The FBI, DOJ, ODNI, CIA and intelligence officials were intentionally not being honest with Pres Trump and key members of his new admin.
ITEM Obviously their lack of honesty was a serious issue, and in some cases had serious ramifications.
This is what Powell has under her legal microscope.
ITEM At 12:15pm on January 20th, 2017, Trump’s inauguration day, outgoing National Security Advisor Susan Rice wrote herself a memo.
ITEM Was Susan Rice protecting herself from consequences if the scheme against President Trump was discovered?
ITEM Rice writes that on January 5, following a briefing by IC leadership on Russian hacking during the 2016 Presidential election, President Obama had a brief follow-on conversation with FBI Director Jim Corney and Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates in the Oval Office. Vice President Biden and I were also present.
ITEM Rice states that then-President Obama stressed his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue is handled by the Intelligence and law enforcement communities “by the book“.
The President stressed that he is not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. He reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would by the book.
From a national security perspective, however, President Obama said he wants to be sure that, as we engage with the incoming team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia.
Obama’s cover story was that he asked Corney to inform him if anything changes in the next few weeks that should affect how we share classified information with the incoming team. Corney said he would.
ITEM Observers any have looked at this as a “CYA” memo, but that’s not what this is.
ITEM This is not a CYA mmo----it is a justification memo, written by an outgoing National Security Advisor Susan Rice to document why there have been multiple false and misleading statements given to the incoming President Trump and all of his officials.
ITEM Flynn was her replacement….and was not advised of many of her activities.
Even the timing of the memo, written 15 minutes prior to the end of the Obama administration, is ex-post-facto useful as evidence of the author’s ….and to provide Obama with a cover story.
Put aside the nonsense aspect to the origination of the investigation for a moment; that part doesn’t apply here…. Accept their position ‘as if’ it is substantive.
Hard to believe they could stoop this low ----but we are talking about Brennan, Comey, Clapper and Yates telling Obama and NSA Susan Rice that Pres-elect Trump is under a counterintelligence investigation ( the story is being mfg) that Donald J Trump is an agent of a foreign power
Under that auspices (fraudulent though it may be) they are protecting themselves from their invented story that incoming President is a counterintelligence investigation target. A potentially compromised Russian asset.
Why? B/c under this iteration all of the officials would be permitted to lie and mislead their target, so long as they did so “By The Book.”
That’s their justification by corrupt govt officials for a lengthy series of lies and false statements.
That’s why FBI Director James Comey can lie to the President and tell him he’s not the target of the ongoing Russia investigation. That’s the justification for keeping the accusations inside the Steele Dossier (remember, the Dossier is evidence) from the President-elect. That’s the justification for all of the officials to lie to President Trump, and even mislead the media if needed.
The Susan Rice email is one big Justification Letter; setting the stage for all of the participants to have a plausible reason for lies to anyone and everyone…...and a particularly detailed confession to many, many crimes. (some details provided by Matt Vespa)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.