Yeah, we did - and we enjoyed it.
Posted on 07/29/2019 7:58:31 PM PDT by bitt
IowaHawk put it brilliantly when he said “Modern journalism is all about covering important questions. With a pillow. Until they stop moving.”
L
“... and getting nothing in return?”
Maye they did, but just buried it. Or maybe the DOJ got nothing, which is what they really wanted anyway.
Presumably, they can still be questioned, and if they don’t give up anything, the immunity can be pulled.
Bkmk for later
Being allowed to continue breathing.
The signers for the DOJ have been redacted. Why?
There won’t be a functioning Windows operating system by the time the doj agrees to reveal the contents of these laptops.
Bkmk
Okay, can these be undone or charges beyond there scope made?
/////////////////////////////////////
I would think they could be undone - because Epstein.
That’s right - what Epstein is accused of is horrific. But it sure doesn’t seem like it was TREASON. Of course, you never know ..........
If the Epstein deal can be set aside I don’t see how the Hillary e-mail deals .... duh, .... snap! I forgot about John Roberts and the Supreme Court.
I would think this will not work because the FBI received nothing in return, which makes the argument they had no intention of prosecuting and were corrupt. Also if other crimes are discovered while investigating the Clinton foundation they can be charged. Were there clauses that granted immunity for receiving bribes? The immunity agreement would have to have covered all of the bases, which with the Clintons is tough to do.
When the screws are put on Comey I am sure he will think of a way to work around the agreement.
There is another way to invalidate the agreements and that is if Mills and Samuelson violated the agreements or lied - which they certainly did.
I not a lawyer, but I play one on FR. I’m supposing prosecutors are the ones that grant immunity instead of judges. Why not arrest the prosecutors that did this and send them to prison. I’ll bet when the sentencing starts, they will start singing about who told them what to do. If they did it on their own, throw the book at them. The legal field doesn’t need more crooks. Conspiracy, fraud, RICO, and that’s just what I thought up in 2 minutes. You shouldn’t need the destroyed evidence to prove that they gave immunity with nothing expected in return. Actually writing that they are allowed to destroy subpoenaed evidence is at least obstruction of justice. I’m sure an honest judge would look at this and smell a rat. You just can’t destroy evidence on a whim.
If you read the actual article from the ACLJ, you will see they used the correct spelling.
I have that tweet, also... ;-)
In one place, the ACLJ article says “aides.” In others, they wrote “aids.”
Yeah, we did - and we enjoyed it.
Immunity from violating the Espionage Act.
Immunity from destroying evidence (bleach bit)
Immunity from violating FOI
What an outrage from DOJ/FBI conduct
RICO, state sponsored destruction of evidence, obstruction of justice... etc.
This is going to get good once the rats turn on each other and begin singing like canaries to save themselves from prison for the rest of their lives.
Bet they were all on the Clinton foundation payroll, check their net worth, bank accounts, off shore accounts. If we turn our backs on real indictments prosecution and jail time all the way up the chain, not just a few unfortunates to make every one happy that they are doing something, lets move on........ Then the constitution is just another piece of paper and the rats win big
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.