Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Trump administration unveils 'new restrictions for asylum' seekers at the Southern Border....
.washingtonexaminer ^ | 7/15/2019 | Melissa Quinn

Posted on 07/15/2019 6:43:20 AM PDT by caww

The Departments of Homeland Security and Justice released a new rule Monday under which migrants who enter the United States at the southern border are ineligible for asylum unless they sought protection in one of the countries they traveled through first. The measure, an effort to stem the flow of migrants from Central America into the U.S., is expected to take effect Tuesday.

To remain eligible for safe harbor in the U.S., the rule requires migrants to first seek protection in a country they traverse, such as Mexico, El Salvador, or Guatemala, before arriving at the southern border.

Attorney General William Barr said in a statement the Trump administration is acting within the authority designed by Congress to restrict asylum eligibility... “This rule will decrease 'forum shopping by economic migrants' and those who seek 'to exploit our asylum system to obtain entry to the United States'.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Mexico
KEYWORDS: asylum; border; bordersecurity; trumpdhs; trumpillegals
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

1 posted on 07/15/2019 6:43:20 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: caww

SNTOWY.

L


2 posted on 07/15/2019 6:46:56 AM PDT by Lurker (Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

Great idea where has congress been all these years oh wait in a democrat induced coma still is.


3 posted on 07/15/2019 6:47:47 AM PDT by Vaduz (women and children to be impacIQ of chimpsted the most.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww
A long time coming, this.

Have they tried it before and some damn lib judge blocked it?

4 posted on 07/15/2019 6:49:17 AM PDT by grobdriver (BUILD KATE'S WALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Judge overrules in ....3,2,1


5 posted on 07/15/2019 6:49:24 AM PDT by gibsonguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Vaduz

So all the Africans who come though Mexico must apply there first? Too funny. I foresee a Mexico/ African war coming on soon.


6 posted on 07/15/2019 6:49:34 AM PDT by oldasrocks (Heavily Medicated for your Protection.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: caww

If they seek it must it be approved? Do they have to wait for the results?


7 posted on 07/15/2019 6:50:05 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (All I know is The I read in the papers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver

We’ll see....goes into effect Tuesday/tomorrow.


8 posted on 07/15/2019 6:55:12 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

Ok: Got the “Still Not Tired Of Winning”, but what’s the Y stand for— ?:)
M


9 posted on 07/15/2019 6:55:53 AM PDT by milagro (There is no peace in appeasement!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: oldasrocks

To remain eligible for safe harbor in the U.S., the rule requires migrants to first seek protection in a country they traverse, such as Mexico, El Salvador, or Guatemala, before arriving at the southern border.


10 posted on 07/15/2019 6:58:34 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: milagro

Yet.

L


11 posted on 07/15/2019 6:59:45 AM PDT by Lurker (Peaceful coexistence with the Left is not possible. Stop pretending that it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: milagro

Goodness, it took too long, “yet” I finally got it—:)!


12 posted on 07/15/2019 6:59:55 AM PDT by milagro (There is no peace in appeasement!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

This rule will decrease forum shopping by ‘economic migrants’ and those who seek to exploit our asylum system to obtain entry to the United States


13 posted on 07/15/2019 7:00:16 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Whenifhow; null and void; aragorn; EnigmaticAnomaly; kalee; Kale; 2ndDivisionVet; azishot; ...

p


14 posted on 07/15/2019 7:00:59 AM PDT by bitt (US intel is there to protect the safety and security of Americans. It is not a political tool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: caww

how?


15 posted on 07/15/2019 7:01:55 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (All I know is The I read in the papers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gibsonguy

Judge overrules in ....3,2,1
**************************
OBAMA Judge overrules in .....3, 2, 1

We have 129 Judicial vacancies. Come on Mitch & Lindsey., get crackin’.


16 posted on 07/15/2019 7:01:58 AM PDT by House Atreides (Boycott the NFL 100% — PERMANENTLY)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: grobdriver

... like other measures implemented by the Trump administration regarding asylum protections for migrants, it’s likely this latest measure will be challenged in federal court.


17 posted on 07/15/2019 7:01:58 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: caww

I thought internat’l law (the Hague or the UN) said something like asylum seekers must ask for asylum in the first country they enter not actively persecuting them...

If so - this ‘new’ rule would support that common sense international requirement


18 posted on 07/15/2019 7:02:57 AM PDT by Plain Old American (Remember who said what)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImJustAnotherOkie

The new restriction from the Trump administration outlines three exceptions:

...if the migrant applied for asylum in at least one of the countries they traveled through ‘before’ arriving in the U.S. but was denied protection;

... if the migrant was a victim of a “severe form” of human trafficking;

... or if none of the countries the migrant traveled through has signed one of three major international treaties protecting refugees.


19 posted on 07/15/2019 7:03:49 AM PDT by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: caww

they should also be required (if wanting assylm to seek it at a border checkpoint BEFORE entering the country.) If they cross into the country illegally, they LOSE the ability to ask for assylm.


20 posted on 07/15/2019 7:05:57 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson