Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/28/2019 7:19:59 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin
Some pundits might mock Broad, pointing out that nothing is preventing him from sending bigger checks to Uncle Sam than current law requires.

I know I sure do. Mock, that is.

2 posted on 06/28/2019 7:26:19 AM PDT by onona (Mexico is a parasite)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

If you want to pay more in taxes, just do this, anybody can do it. The millionaires just want to look good by saying this.

Just do the following to pay more! No need to announce it!

How do you make a contribution to reduce the debt?

There are two ways for you to make a contribution to reduce the debt:

At Pay.gov, you can contribute online by credit card, debit card, PayPal, checking account, or savings account.
You can write a check payable to the Bureau of the Fiscal Service, and, in the memo section, notate that it’s a gift to reduce the debt held by the public. Mail your check to:

Attn Dept G
Bureau of the Fiscal Service
P. O. Box 2188
Parkersburg, WV 26106-2188


3 posted on 06/28/2019 7:26:28 AM PDT by ktw (72 ID, Finally Retired after 25 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I mock him.

Because there is nothing to stop him from writing a big annual extra check to his beloved government. In reality, what he is truly advocating is that he wants his beloved leftist government to confiscate more of everyone else’s money to waste on whatever, and, maybe spend some of it on his priorities - not mine.


4 posted on 06/28/2019 7:26:40 AM PDT by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Step 1: Billionaires ask to be taxed more.
Step 2: Congress raises taxes on billionaires.
Step 3: Billionaires set up tax shelters to avoid new taxes.

Everybody’s happy.


5 posted on 06/28/2019 7:28:19 AM PDT by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Gov Huckabee had the solution for this. While governor of Arkansas he created the TaxMeMore fund. There was a line on his state income tax specifically asking for more tax money and it would go into the TaxMeMore fund. This way it would be easy to track how much money was contributed to the fund. Guess what? It wasn’t much. As I recall only a few of the leftist legislatures that were pushing for this contributed to the fund and it wasn’t much.

We need a national TaxMeMore fund...


6 posted on 06/28/2019 7:37:13 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

I’ve also heard Ken Langone (co-founder of HomeDepot) talk about this. He said why should he give more money to the government. He has huge endowments and charities, has built hospitals etc.. He said he is far better to allocate his charitable dollars than the government is. Does anyone (even a leftist) disagree?


7 posted on 06/28/2019 7:39:39 AM PDT by Old Teufel Hunden
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

(paraphrasing Henny Youngman): There are a lot of things in life that make no sense. Take my taxes... ...please.


8 posted on 06/28/2019 7:44:49 AM PDT by Migraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Certainly Bernie Sanders has no need for three homes or Elizabeth Warren for her millions. When are they going to spread their wealth around? As Orwell said so well... “All animals are equal, but some are more equal than others”.


11 posted on 06/28/2019 7:59:14 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Socialists are happy until they run out of other people's money." Margaret Thatche)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Yo billionaires. If you want to pay higher taxes, just write the damn check and STFU!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


12 posted on 06/28/2019 8:03:46 AM PDT by Hyman Roth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

And, yet, again, the BIG questions remain to be unasked and unanswered:

- FOR what?
- by what AUTHORITY?

Any ‘debate’ beyond is moot until rectified.

Course, nobody on the (R)N(C) side of the Uniparty dare even THINK along those lines either...might start to expect more than platitudes.


13 posted on 06/28/2019 8:25:11 AM PDT by i_robot73 (One could not count the number of *solutions*, if only govt followed\enforced the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
The premise that "income inequality" somehow assumes that higher taxes paid to the government will magically translate into increased income for the downtrodden is completely false. The goal of government is not re-distribution from the wealthy to those in poverty, and the government is very inefficient at doing this.

At best, this is a feel-good measure to those potential voters who have lower incomes (and who might be inclined to vote for progressive Democrats.)

At worst, it's a cynical way for the federal government to attempt to increase its coffers--though there's no proof that such a "wealth tax" would necessarily accomplish the goal of move revenue. Even if the tax successfully raised government revenue, any trickle-down would be minuscule.

14 posted on 06/28/2019 8:27:15 AM PDT by Lou L (Health "insurance" is NOT the same as health "care")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
Confiscatory taxation and taxes on the rich:

Mass prosperity requires economic progress, which requires a pro-capitalistic political program, which requires rationality, natural rights, including private property rights, capital accumulation, and technological progress and advances.

The total abolition of the personal and corporate income taxes and of the inheritance tax is an essential feature of a pro-capitalist political program. It is required by the individual’s right to his own property. In addition, progress toward the abolition of these taxes helps to create the conditions required for economic progress, by increasing economic incentives, and the ability to save, both of which serve to promote capital accumulation, and thus a rising productivity of labor and rising average real wage rates.

15 posted on 06/28/2019 8:30:45 AM PDT by mjp ((pro-{God, reality, reason, egoism, individualism, natural rights, limited government, capitalism}))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Misunderstanding of Macro Economics. The more Capitol that is taken out of the private sector, the smaller it is; also everyone tends to hoard Capitol when ‘the rich’ have to pay more.

Less commerce; less job opportunity; less wealth for others who want to invest in the private sector; eventually less tax revenue collected because there are fewer wealthy individuals. But more Government power.

If one wants to pay taxes, go ahead, but forcing everyone else to pay a higher tax rate because you think “raise my taxes” is an economic boon for the government is an uneducated view of how private sector Macro Economics works.


16 posted on 06/28/2019 8:33:24 AM PDT by Son House
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

He can pay more taxes, if he wants to, nobody is stopping him.

The problem is that they are all talk, and ultimately they want the rest of us to pay more taxes, while they find every loophole, because they are rich.


17 posted on 06/28/2019 8:36:08 AM PDT by Innovative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson