Posted on 06/12/2019 10:41:56 PM PDT by bitt
Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif., said he has seen the scope memo for special counsel Robert Mueller's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 campaign.
The House Intelligence Committee's top Republican slipped the news in at the end of an interview Wednesday evening with Fox News host Sean Hannity.
"I was finally able to see the scope memo," he said. "And remember, I had these concerns that it was based upon the Steele dossier."
Chief Political Correspondent Byron York on the expanded The California congressman said he could not talk about what is in the memo, but noted that Mueller's report was "probably, largely based on" British ex-spy Christopher Steele's unverified dossier on President Trump's ties to Russia.
The Justice Department and House Intelligence Committee struck a deal last month for access to underlying material to Mueller's investigation. Nunes has been heavily critical of Mueller, calling his report a "shoddy political hit piece" during a hearing Wednesday.
Allies of Trump, including Nunes, have called for full disclosure of that memo, to see "what Robert Mueller was supposed to be looking at" and documents related to investigatory efforts looking into Trump's inner circle, including FISA warrants that targeted onetime campaign aide Carter Page.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...
p
What the heck was Rod Rosenstein thinking?
....this time...THIS time...
I hadn't heard about a third memo, but with the period of time that had elapsed between memos, it certainly looks like Mueller's team was manipulating the system to suit their needs, and Rosenstein capitulated each time. Every time they found someone or something new they wanted to investigate, they'd go running to Rosenstein, and he'd provide the means for them to do so. Rosenstein was a willing participant.
Yawn.
21 Apr: ConservativeTreehouse: Second Scope Memo Rosenstein Authorizes Mueller to Target Michael Flynn Jr
by sundance
The original authorization for the appointment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller was May 17th, 2017. However, the recently released Weissmann report shows there were two additional scope memos authorizing specific targeting of the Mueller probe. The first scope memo was August 2nd, 2017, OUTLINED HERE, and is an important part of the puzzle that helps explain the corrupt original purpose of the special counsel.
The second scope memo was issued by Rod Rosenstein to Robert Mueller on October 20th, 2017...
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2019/04/21/second-scope-memo-rosenstein-authorizes-mueller-to-target-michael-flynn-jr/
Always some big expose that never happens
Its almost like theres a deep state causing this material to never be de-classified
someone, every day since Benghazi
I took a lot of heat for suggesting Barr was engaging in Modified, Limited Hangout here on FReerepublic a few weeks back. Now it seems most of us see it.
it’s still Devin Van Pelt until the President kicks the football!
At this point, there is little evidence for that. All we have informationally is what happened under Sessions. Which was awful. The man was a huge mistake and disappointment.
Barr is not Sessions. He hasn't acted cowed, he hasn't been wishy-washy, he has not backed down in his claims. He continues to say Trump was spied on. He continues to say he's going to investigate to find out if there was any actual reason for what all these bad actors did. He has appointed a prosecutor who has subpoena and grand jury power. He clearly thinks something has been done that may have been illegal.
On top of that, it's clear that the democrats fear him, and intend to try to demonize him. A sure sign he is on the right track.
We know nothing, other than what we've seen him do for a couple of months. So far he's done everything we want a person of integrity to do.
Pretending we know he's going to do nothing, as Sessions did, is the height of hypocrisy, defeatism, an cynicism.
It's possible you are correct, but there is nothing in what we can see that points to that being the correct way to think about it.
The House Intelligence Committee's top Republican slipped the news in at the end of an interview Wednesday evening with Fox News host Sean Hannity.
"I was finally able to see the scope memo," he said. "And remember, I had these concerns that it was based upon the Steele dossier."
May 31, 2019
Nunes: "He [Mueller] was so blatantly dishonest yesterday that he says, well, the Office of Legal Counsel says that you cant indict a sitting president.
Well, he should have been gone after day two.
He has no Russians, except for the Fusion and Clinton Russians, and possibly the dirty cop, the FBIs Russians, those are the only Russians that he has, to show connections to the Trump campaign.
Clearly, the Clinton operation is heavily working with Russians or Russian disinformation.
He didnt take time to look into any of that[!]
Partial transcript above begins at about the 1:34 mark in the video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yutgFcr5T9A&list=PLlTLHnxSVuIyw5jPrLmewrpBJAPYKhgml&index=3
___________________________________________________________________________________
[Ranking Member of the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, Devin] Nunes said Clinton's campaign and the DNC "plainly colluded" with the Russians to receive and disseminate false information about Trump"
Newly released notes from an Oct. 11, 2016, meeting between Steele and former [Hillary-Obama] Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Kathleen Kavalec cast doubt on the reliability of his dossier and called into question the information provided to the court in the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act application that was submitted later that month against onetime Trump campaign adviser Carter Page.
The notes, which Kavalec is believed to have emailed to the FBI in mid-October, indicate that Steele knew he had been hired by Hillary Clinton's campaign and the Democratic National Committee and had been told they wanted his findings made public prior to the 2016 election on Nov. 8.
The Daily Caller reported the notes show Steele identified Russian sources, including former Russian foreign intelligence director Vyacheslav Trubnikov and Vladislav Surkov, an aide to Russian President Vladimir Putin.
Nunes said Clinton's campaign and the DNC "plainly colluded" with the Russians to receive and disseminate false information about Trump.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Vladislav Yuryevich Surkov (born 21 September 1964)[1] is a Russian businessman and politician of Chechen descent.[2]
He was First Deputy Chief of the Russian Presidential Administration from 1999 to 2011, during which time he was widely seen as the main ideologist of the Kremlin who proposed and implemented the concept of sovereign democracy in Russia.
From December 2011 until May 2013 Surkov served as the Russian Federations Deputy Prime Minister.[3][4]
After his resignation, Surkov returned to the Presidential Executive Office and became a personal adviser of Vladimir Putin on relationships with Abkhazia, South Ossetia and Ukraine.[5]
Surkov is perceived by many to be a key figure with much power and influence in the administration of Vladimir Putin.[6][7][8]
According to The Moscow Times, this perception is not dependent on the official title Surkov might hold at any one time in the Putin government.[9]
BBC documentary filmmaker Adam Curtis credits Surkovs blend of theater and politics with keeping Putin, and Putins chosen successors, in power since 2000.[10]
Journalists in Russia and abroad have speculated that Surkov writes under the pseudonym Nathan Dubovitsky, although the Kremlin denies it.[11][12][13][14]
Dossier author Christopher Steele identified a former Russian spy chief and a top adviser to Russian President Vladimir Putin as being involved in handling potentially compromising information about President Donald Trump, State Department notes show.
In her notes, [Hillary Clinton/Obama] State Department official Kathleen Kavalec also referred to the two Russians former Russian foreign intelligence chief Vyacheslav Trubnikov and Putin aide Vladislav Surkov as sources. ...
https://dailycaller.com/2019/05/16/steele-dossier-sources-state-department/
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________
On Wednesday, [May 1, 2019] Attorney General William Barr testified that he is concerned about the Trump-Russia dossier compiled by former British spy Christopher Steele and paid for by the Democratic National Committee and the Hillary Clinton campaign.
Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) asked Barr whether or not the Department of Justice (DOJ) could confirm that the Steele dossier was not part of the disinformation campaign Russia used to interfere in the 2016 presidential election.
How do we know that the Steele dossier is not itself evidence of the Russian disinformation campaign, knowing what we know now that basically the allegations made therein were second-hand, hearsay, or unverified, Cornyn stated, referring to key claims in the dossier that the report from Special Counsel Robert Mueller disproved, such as the claim that Trump lawyer Michael Cohen traveled to Prague.
Can you state with confidence that the Steele dossier was not part of the Russian disinformation campaign? Cornyn asked.
No, I cant state that with confidence and that is one of the areas that Im reviewing, Barr replied. Im concerned about it and I dont think its entirely speculative.
If Russia had a hand in the Steele dossier, that would imply that Hillary Clintons campaign and the DNC either worked with Russians or were duped by the Russians in their disinformation campaigns.
It would mean that the real collusion with Russia may have been on the Clinton side, rather than the Trump side.
(Excerpt) Read more at pjmedia.com ...
__________________________________________________________________________
July 2017...
While the mainstream news media hunts for evidence of Trump-Russia collusion, the public record shows that Democrats have willfully used Moscow disinformation to influence the presidential election against Donald Trump and attack his administration.
The disinformation came in the form of a Russian-fed dossier written by former British intelligence agent Christopher Steele. It contains a series of unverified criminal charges against Mr. Trumps campaign aides, such as coordinating Moscows hacking of Democratic Party computers.
Some Democrats have widely circulated the discredited information.
Mr. Steele was paid by the Democrat-funded opposition research firm Fusion GPS with money from a Hillary Clinton backer.
Fusion GPS distributed the dossier among Democrats and journalists. The information fell into the hands of the FBI, which used it in part to investigate Mr. Trumps campaign aides.
Mr. Steele makes clear that his unproven charges came almost exclusively from sources linked to the Kremlin and Russian President Vladimir Putin. He identified his sources as a senior Russian Foreign Ministry figure, a former top level Russian intelligence officer active inside the Kremlin, a senior Kremlin official and a senior Russian government official.
The same Democrats who have condemned Russias election interference via plying fake news and hacking email servers have quoted freely from the Steele anti-Trump memos derived from creatures of the Kremlin.
In other words, there is public evidence of significant, indirect collusion between Democrats and Russian disinformation...
Continued at source...
https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2017/jul/11/democrats-spread-false-russian-information-on-trum/
Or,
You could be correct. Let me see if I can get a hold of Lois Lerner and see what she has to say.
Thankfully, Trump isn't going to let this go unanswered. He is not the GOPe, plus Sessions is no longer AD. Giving up like you appear to be doing helps nobody.
And this is from someone that Lois Lerner audited.
In this day and age it is just assumed one will lie back and take it. Im thinking that is a YUGE mistake.
Taking crap from the left is the last thing any of us should do at this point. Allowing them to make us cynical is part of that.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.