Skip to comments.New York Times bans reporters from CNN's Don Lemon, MSNBC's Maddow shows for being 'too partisan:'..
Posted on 05/30/2019 5:57:34 PM PDT by jazusamo
click here to read article
The Pot Calling the Kettle Commie Lying, Dying Fake News Liberal Media - NO Lie They Won’t Tell
Very good comment.
Their audience must be shrinking badly. So...Lets make ourselves look more moderate, and sucker the rubes back in.
Thanks for a great question on this thread that could be:
The Onion, right? Or maybe Babylon Bee?
I did not expect this announcement from the NYTimes.
“veto by Nevadas Governor was the first shock.”
Me, too. Here in the People’s Republic of Colorado, it was passed and signed.
The Louisiana Dem Governor signing the heartbeat bill was the 2nd shock of the day..a Dem Governor who is pro life, went outside to make sure I didnt see any piggies flying
Wonder if there is an effort to fake to their not-totally-lefty voters that there is some semblance of non-lunacy bouncing around in their lumpen noggins.
The National Popular Vote Compact was given a thumbs down by the Maine House today, too. Another shock!
Why on earth would the New York Times do this ?!!!
There is absolutely NO possibility the NYT is not partisan.
Breaking news: All NYTimes reporters have been banned from the NYTimes, because the NYTimes is too partisan.
MSNBC is Comcast
CNN is ATT
Yes, it is CYA and plausible deniability ahead of the media exposures, but so what? The brain-dead readers of NYT can now suck on it as their Paper of Record quietly withdraws from active participation in the so-called, mis-named resistance.
Slowly, slowly, catchee monkee.
Add NYT to “he broke them” list.
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black. Sheer hypocrisy from the NY Slimes. Just trying to cover their asses when their deep involvement in Dossiergate and covering up UraniumOneGate and Servergate is revealed in congressional hearings.
Gee, Lemon, the racist ignoramus; Maddow the insane Marxist, and O’Donnell the double secret insane Marxist psychopath - “too partisan”?
That’s like saying Mussolini banned his own SS from working with the German/Nazi SS because they were “too partisan” in their dislike of Jews, Gypsies, homosexuals, etc.
Do I heard a loud and collective “Bullshit, NYT”?
Or is it taht the partisanship is so overt that the Times is afraid it will be bad for their image?
Too little, too late. What happened? Did they finally tune in? Did someone explain what their words mean? Thanks jazusamo.
LOL! Does the racist NY Times think theyre going to fool anyone into believing theyre not hyperpartisan?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.