Posted on 05/24/2019 9:33:03 AM PDT by Kaslin
Excellent point!
Yup.
It has not been straight men that have demanded tolerance and acceptance of all forms of perversion of both males and females in this country.
This is what they do in the House when they’re not hounding President Trump.
I could say something like women wanting equality. But, physically its impossible for the majority of females to physically equal or better because of nature. How ever when it comes to some things men are not women’s equal either. There are differences in the sexes.
Your reference to Equestrian events has me thinking….
In the horse racing world, there are events for colts and events for fillies. On rare occasions a filly will be entered into an event against the colts - think Ruffian, for instance. Yet, her greatness was because she actually could compete against males, and she was such a phenom that they decided to have a special match race against a colt. Although she ran well, she stumbled, broke her leg, and was euthanized. It was all over the sports pages.
This event brings up the reality of males and females competing against each other. The rarity of competitive females against males is newsworthy, and in horse racing it is no different. Males are much stronger that females and that is why they have races for fillies. They are just as exciting, but not generally known as the publicity favors the colts. More money, etc..
Having athletic events pitting women against men is idiotic. Why is society always promoting dissension between Men and women? In this world, esp. amongst mammals, the world revolves around 2 genders. It takes 2 to tango.
As for beach volleyball, I wonder how it would look to have men competing in women’s gymnastics? Hmmm..... intersex leotards, anyone???
...the imgage that springs to mind is Borat in that sling thing...scores of them ruining viewing for all..need some mental eye bleach now, yeech
God IS good! And he designed things well. When we go against His design, well...
“Oh good God. Oh yes, Klintoon and Uhbama are all due to us women.”
Women’s voting:
1992 Clinton 46%, Bush 38%
1996 Clinton 55%, Dole 38%
2008 Obama 56%, McCain 43%
2012 Obama 55%, Romney 44%
Men only went 1 point to Clinton or Obama in two of those, other two were majority R. Women went 8% or more to D in all.
So...true.
The mentally insane possessors of XY chromosomes that can afford surgery trump naturally born possessors of XX chromosomes.
Science deniers.
Consider who’s in that “voting bloc”.
Only ONE demographic votes lock-step predictable Dem. That’s blacks. Consider that they’re 12% of the pop and you have what could have brought that “woman” figure to a bit more than 50%. Outside them, it’s a statistical tie.
Yeah, it’s true - with black women throwing it off, never mind the other demos who are 75% majority.
Huh?
Your 8% max disparity can be accounted for by the 95% of black women voting Dem.
Keep it to whites and it will constantly be a statistical tie at 50%. We are not so easily predictable as you like to think.
I wrote “8% or more”. That means minimum, not maximum.
Blacks were 8% to 13% of the votes (from links below), 62% of it women in 2012. That’s 8% (this IS a max) black women voters of all women voters, so your premise could only play for 1992. The other three election results are on white women.
https://ropercenter.cornell.edu/how-groups-voted-1992
https://ropercenter.cornell.edu/how-groups-voted-1996
https://ropercenter.cornell.edu/how-groups-voted-2008
https://ropercenter.cornell.edu/how-groups-voted-2012
I’m not predicting. I’m using data and math.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.