Indeed, it sure does seem like a gross violation of the Fourth Amendment which is short, to the point, and crystal clear:
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.What is the probable cause? Where is the warrant? Who signed the Oath or affirmation?
Folks should educate themselves to the established law.
Congress has a plenary right to subpoena for anything they damn well please. Only when that subpoena is a gross violation of the Bill of Rights will the courts even take the case.
Congress investigating a POTUS will NOT be touched by the Judiciary. Just as they will shy away from Executive Privilege.
Exactly. This demand for private papers is completely lawless.
It is a fishing expedition masquerading as a legitimate investigation.