Yep. Chelsea Manning is back in jail

Hot Air.com ^ | May 17, 2019 | JAZZ SHAW

[Socon-Econ]

Manning is a “he”, not a “she”.

[ArtDodger]

We call it a jail. Manning calls it a sex-retreat.

[Olog-hai]

And his name is Bradley.

(Do the freaks still call that “deadnaming”??)

[Gay State Conservative]

It would break my heart if Brad were to suffer a sudden...or long and painful...death.One thing's for sure...if he had ever been in uniform during *my* day (long,long ago) those around him would have made him wish he had died as a child.

[ArtDodger]

Pulllleeease! Whatever yo do, don’t throw me in da briar patch!

[Olog-hai]

He’ll get no shortage of amorous attention in there, no doubt.

[Boomer]

Bradley is right where he needs to be. Wink wink.

[antidemoncrat]

“Well, I hope she took that advice because she’s back behind bars again”

Mens’ prison or womens’ prison? Wouldn’t want her to get raped in the wrong one...wink wink.

[al baby]

Is name is MANning I’m surprised he doesn’t drop that

[mad_as_he$$]

At least they are making it pay this time. How does the judge expect to collect?

[golux]

I do not understand why Jazz and Townhall keep insisting on incorrect nomenclature.

[Red Badger]

How can a judge just order something like this on a US citizen?..............

[Red Badger]

IIRC, in this type of incarceration, it’s basically solitary confinement.................

[DanielRedfoot]

‘Pick up the soap Manning, you cant get a date in here either...”

[shanover]

In a different era HE would have been hung or shot.

[Olog-hai]

Probably finagle some sort of visitation.

[JimRed]

It ain’t a SHE!

[elpadre]

Maybe Manning has found a home - three meals a day, a bed, lots of recreational stuff, companions, no bills to pay - and all free. What a deal!!! Manning you are one smart cookie!!!

[Sa-teef]

He is in contempt of court by refusing to testify before the grand jury. They can not compell him to answer self-incriminating questions but they can compel him to answer questions (under the threat of contempt) on other matters. Bradley is refusing that, saying the grand jury system is unlawful, which it isn't.

Judges have a LOT of leeway in sentencing under contempt and while a small monetary fine or a day or two in the cooler is usually sufficient to loosen lips, in many jurisdictions it is "up to the judge" if they want to pile on a bit.