Nellie Ohr deleted emails sent from husband's DOJ account

Washington Examiner ^ | May 16, 2019 01:52 PM | Daniel Chaitin |

[TXnMA]

"Is there some difference between these two that I should be aware of?"

There is, indeed a YUGE legal difference between the two:

See #20 for the answer to your question.

[sgt_lau]

I can’t wait for the day that her ugly mug is shown with the “I’m in really big trouble, aren’t I?” look on it. She thought she was un-touchable. Hag.

[chris37]

That may be true, but she was certainly engaged in treason and in the destruction of the evidence of treason.

[TXnMA]

No question that Nellie Orr is guilty of many evil acts; I hope both she and Bruce are put away for a long time. Unfortunately, destruction of her own e-mails may not be one of the acts she can be charged with.

OTOH, Avoiding FOIA archiving of HRC's evil doings (Clinton Foundation, etc...) was one of her prime motivations -- and a definite Federal crime, when she destroyed 30K of her e-mails. (Did you know that she absolutely refused to allow a government e-mail address be issued to her?)

I believe your understanding of the magnitude of HRC's crimes would benefit if you watched this video I created in advance of the 2016 election: "No Intent?!?" ...

Even today, the only detail of fact I would change is that some of that "stack of 'lost' Blackberries" were actually physically destroyed -- as in "smashed with a hammer".

Enjoy!
TXnMA